New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About Paul R. Hollrah
Paul R. Hollrah is a freelance writer. He is a member of the Civil Engineering Academy of Distinguished Alumni at the University of Missouri - Columbia and a Senior Fellow at the Lincoln Heritage Institute. He currently resides in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Social Bookmarking
Bookmark and Share
Past Articles
The Anti-Rally Rally
An Open Letter to Michael Steele
Mr. Obama, Meet Ms. Everywoman
Integrating the Congressional Black Caucus
A Republican To-Do List
Our Failing Public Schools
Islam’s Achilles Heel
From Hooverville to Obamaville
The Electoral College is Under Attack
Democrats Suppress Military Vote...Again
Remembering Gravitas
The States Trump Obama
Charlie Bolden Has Fleas
It’s Not Easy Being Greene
The General & The Community Organizer
The Eric Balderas Caper
Al & Tipper Split the Sheets
A Cancer is Growing on the Presidency
Greece Today, America Tomorrow
The Obama Eligibility Question
A Tangled Web
The Post-Decency Pretender
The Reluctant Boy Scout
Political Violence in America
Killing the Healthcare Monster
Confessions of an Axe Murderer
The Obama Eligibility Question Lives On
The Enemy Within
Chuck de Caro’s War: Part 3
Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire
The Fall of Barack Obama
Chuck de Caro’s War: Part 2
Shifting Political Winds
The Insanity Called Airport Security
The Pentagon War on CVSA: An Analysis
The 2010 Elections: Our Last Chance?
Testosterone Shortage Strikes GOP
Honduras Snubs Obama
Chuck de Caro’s War
The Twenty-Eighth Amendment
Obama Is Not Eligible
The Pot & The Kettle
Unemployment Flim-Flam
Is Obama Impeachable?
Rising Above the Rabble
Obama's Dual Citizenship
The Summer of 1981
Democrat Racism "Bubbles" Up
Political Poison Pills
'C' is for Conspiracy, 'D' is for Democrat
Echoes from the Grave
The Real Ted Kennedy
Revolution
The Real Problem with Healthcare
Hostage Rescue...Clinton Style
Recalling Soylent Green
Obama: Hope, Change & Failure
Obama’s Double-Edged Sword
Obama's Honduras Blunder
Obama-Soros Hyperinflation
The Mark Sanford Affair
GM's 330-Page Death Warrant
History Repeats Itself
Obama the Cyber Snowman
The Sotomayor Nomination
A 100-Day Report Card
Corrupting the 2010 Census
Our Presidential Dilemma
The Drug War is Lost
The Icarus Factor
The Four Horsemen of the (American) Apocalypse
Bernie & Ruth & Chuck & Hillary
Obama is Dancing, But Who Calls the Tune?
Well...Is He, or Isn’t He?
A Tale of Two Impeachments
The Road to Fascism
Mad Max Threatens California

Paul R. Hollrah
The Anti-Rally Rally

September 27, 2010

On August 28, 2010, Fox talk show host and commentator Glen Beck held a rally on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. The theme of the rally was "Restore Honor,” a most worthy goal...one that modern day America needs to pursue with renewed passion.

People from all over the country bought plane, train, and bus tickets, or carpooled with others to attend the rally. So many traveled to Washington for the rally that hotel rooms were impossible to get. Some rally-goers were required to book hotels and motels forty or fifty miles away.

The rally was a huge success, drawing some 500,000 to 650,000 people from every state in the nation. They were orderly and well-behaved, and when the professional black rabble-rouser, Rev. Al Sharpton, announced that he would hold a counter rally in southeast Washington, just a few miles away, some feared that the two groups might clash and that the competing rallies would devolve into 60s style violence.

There is little doubt that that was precisely what Sharpton had in mind. If there was to be yet another opportunity to convince black Americans that the American Dream was not there for them unless they maintained their solidarity with the Democrat Party, in spite of decades of professional black agitation and welfare pimping by himself and Jesse Jackson, he wanted to be sure that he was there to lead the attack, violent or non-violent, for the network TV cameras.

Clearly, Beck and his organizers understood that the potential for violence lay just beneath the surface. In response, and to prevent his peaceful rally from becoming just another excuse for the mainstream media to bash the Tea Party movement, Beck requested that those attending his rally not come armed with anti-big government, anti-tax, anti-spending, and anti-Obama picket signs. And in spite of the fact that those attending his rally had transported tons of poster board and other sign-making materials for just that purpose, they all honored his request. Hardly a picket sign was to be seen in the immense crowd.

It must have been a big disappointment for Sharpton, who had already scheduled appearances on every network to deliver his post-mortem on the Beck rally. As it turned out, he was at a loss for words. His only point of quickly-manufactured controversy was the charge that Beck and his mostly white crowd had attempted to hijack Martin Luther King’s legacy. Most viewers responded with a yawn or a puzzled, "Huh?”

But now we learn that the rally concept is about to grow a painful wart. Seeing a grassroots patriotic movement take shape right before their eyes, where millions of hard-working, tax-paying Americans have become sufficiently aroused to take to the streets...a phenomenon that has heretofore been largely the province of the violence-prone elements of organized labor and the radical left...some leftists see the need to mock the process in such a way as to discredit the Beck rally and the Tea Party movement. Late night comedians Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert have announced plans to hold a rally in Washington, DC, a la the Beck rally.

The question is, will it work or will the idea fall flat on its face? I say it will fall flat on its face...for a number of very good reasons.

First, who is to lead the effort? Who are Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert? These are men of marginal comedic ability who are cheap imitations of David Letterman, who is a cheap imitation of Jay Leno, who is the widely-accepted heir to the throne of Johnny Carson. They are the pied-pipers of a segment of our population who are simply too intellectually lazy to form real political opinions of their own and who find it convenient to mask their ignorance of history and current affairs with a bit of humor.

After graduating from our public schools, where they learn so little about American history and government that few could compete with naturalized citizens, they are suddenly thrust into an adult world where they find themselves with both free speech and voting rights...real grown-up responsibilities.

They haven’t the foggiest notion of what to do with those newfound responsibilities so they tune in to either Stewart or Colbert where they are sure to find safety in numbers. As members of that audience they will never be required to embarrass themselves by publicly displaying their ignorance. That is what Stewart and Colbert are all about, and nothing more. They provide comedic cover for the politically ignorant and the intellectually lazy.

In August 1969, thousands of mostly young people gathered on a large farm near Bethel, New York for an outdoor rock concert. It was what came to be known as Woodstock...a three-day orgy of incredibly bad music, drunkenness, sex, and drugs. It was an opportunity for teens and twenty-somethings to get drunk, stoned, and laid, all in broad daylight and with all of the world looking on. In many respects, the level of irresponsibility that Woodstock meant to the music world, is little different from what Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert mean to the serious business of politics and government.

The one great difference is that Woodstock represented a memorable moment in the American culture. It will be long remembered as a generational sea change; the Stewart-Colbert rally will not. It will be quickly forgotten because it will have no real purpose, much like the lives of most who will attend. It is not political advancement or enlightenment, it is pure political escapism.

Will Stewart and Colbert attract large crowds to their rally...comparable to the Beck rally? Not likely. Unlike the Stewart and Colbert audiences, those who attended the Beck rally were people who had attended primary and secondary schools when it really meant something; they were people who behaved themselves in school and who did their homework; they were people who had jobs, who showed up for work every day, on time, and who gave their employers their very best effort.

It is people like these who would drive for days to attend a day-long rally with the theme, "Restore Honor.” It does not describe the Stewart and Colbert audiences.

Can we expect those who are too intellectually lazy to form their own political opinions to travel all the way to Washington for nothing more than a pointless counter-rally designed to mock the Beck rally? Not likely. If Stewart and Colbert are able to draw a tenth, or even a hundredth of the crowd that attended the Beck rally, they will be locals...mostly government employees who will take off work, on the taxpayer’s dime, to attend.

It will be yet another metaphor for left wing politics in America.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review