|
|
About Nancy Salvato
Nancy Salvato
has worked in the
field of education since 1986, her experience spanning grades P-12 as a
classroom teacher and as a clinical instructor at the postsecondary level. She
is an experienced higher education administrator with demonstrated proficiency
in accreditation and licensure, governmental relations, operations, curriculum
and instruction, assessment, utilizing a student information system (SIS) and a
learning management system (LMS). She received her undergraduate degree in
History from Loyola University of Chicago and a master’s degree in Early
Childhood Development from National Louis University. Post graduate study has
focused the US Constitution, in particular, analyzing the historical,
philosophical, and religious influences which culminated in this covenant
amongst the citizens of this country and between those governed and those
elected to office. An accomplished writer, Nancy contributes regularly to The
World and I, a publication of the Washington Times, The New Media Journal,
Family Security Matters, and a host of new media publications. Highlights of
her career including being invited to the Department of Education to meet with
then Secretary of Education, Rod Paige, being selected to participate in the
National Academy for Civics and Government, and writing and publishing Keeping a
Republic: An Argument for Sovereignty for and through her 501c3,
BasicsProject.org. |
|
|
|
Social Bookmarking
|
Recent Articles
I’m a
Writer, Not a Financial Planner
The Truth Will Set You Free
Eternal Principle
For
the Long Haul
A Brief
History of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict
Should the Ends Justify the Means?
News
Fast
Making
Sense of the Legislative Branch...
The
Shot Heard Round the World
Counting the Votes Before They Are In
‘Excuse
Me...Can You Help Me with Some Change?’
For the
General Welfare, or An Encroachment...
The Turkey
That Is Obamanomics
An
Abridgement of Constitutional Rights
Utopia or Dystopian
Nightmare?
M-O-N-E-Y &
Influence
Political Science
101: Power Breeds Corruption
Two
Americas or One Nation with Liberty & Justice...
Setting New
Standards with Online Education
Necessity
is the Mother of Invention
Circumnavigating the Rule of Law
In Just 100 Days
Defining Article 2,
Section 1 in Context
A Constitutionally Illiterate Congressional Leadership
Natural Born Citizens
Impoverishment, Elitism & Apathy
An
Alternative to Impending Doom
Effective "Tools" in Education
Houston, We Have a Problem
Letting the Evidence Speak for Itself
The Right to Defend Sovereignty
Undermining Our Sovereignty from Without & Within
Risking Our
Nation’s Sovereignty
True
Patriots Put Country First
The Oath of a Citizen
The
Constitution, Two Candidates & An Election
Article II,
Section 1: Just Words |
|
|
Nancy Salvato, Senior Editor
I’m a Writer, Not a Financial Planner
December 6, 2010
Like many
Americans, I searched for a new job in 2010. Although I wasn’t unemployed at the
time of my search, I concluded that it was in my best interest to find a job
with a company that offered more stability and in which my job skills would
continue to be valued. When I was offered a position which fit my criteria, with
room to grow, I opted to take it. This meant no longer living near family and
friends, which would be hard. Thankfully, they were supportive of my decision
and agreed this would be best. There was one other hurdle. I would need to sell
my home.
Very quickly
we realized the extent of the economic recession in Illinois, as there was no
way our house would sell without our owing money. Like many Americans, we had
three options. We could default, we could rent and try and ride it out, or we
could short sell. Since we had invested a good sized down payment into the
house, defaulting or short selling were not our first choices. We decided to
rent if we could find a tenant.
Surprisingly,
we did find a tenant who would pay us the same amount that would be required of
us to rent a home out of state. Though we would have to continue to supplement
the cost of our present mortgage because we would not be renting the house for
the amount of our mortgage payment, we would not lose money. We could just hold
the house until things got better. The Universe seemed to be smiling on us.
After we
signed our contract, the renter backed out. A family lawyer advised us that had
we gone after the renter, it would have not only cost us money, but we would not
recover the 12 months of promised rent. A number of scenarios could play out;
meanwhile, we would not be able to show the house. So, we settled for the
deposit, we paid rent to live in our new residence, and continued to make
mortgage payments on the home we still owned. In addition, we paid a manager’s
fee to the real estate agent, we paid a landscaper to maintain the yard, and we
paid utilities on the house. Fortunately, after 3 months of showings, the
realtor found us some tenants who were willing to pay less than what we are
currently paying to rent the home in which we live. We took their offer in order
to stop the hemorrhaging of our savings.
Renting the
home which we own, and on which I pay a mortgage while I am at the same time
renting a home owned by someone else paying a mortgage, officially qualifies me
as a landlord with an income property. This status does not require that I own
the home in which I presently reside. This status does not require that I profit
from the property I rent to tenants. The mortgage company and the insurance
company have determined that I am in possession of income property because there
are tenants living in my house. Period. I find this new designation laughable.
This is because, as I think I’ve made clear, what my tenants pay me per month
doesn’t begin to cover my mortgage.
If I didn’t
own my current property, in the amount of time that I’ve been paying rent to
live in the state where I took a new job 6 months ago, had I simply defaulted
instead of maintaining my mortgage payments, I could have put away $10,000
dollars by now, and that is after taxes. Had I placed that money, pre-tax, into
my employer offered retirement plan, not only would I have been assured of some
matching funds, I could have socked away a much larger sum for my retirement.
Instead, I made the incredibly bad decision to hold onto my house so that I
wouldn’t lose my credit, and with the hope that I could sell it eventually,
without owing money and maybe making back some of my initial investment.
Ironically, I
find myself maintaining the payments on my mortgage out of courtesy to the
tenants who are living in my home, while I rent a home owned by someone else. If
I simply stop making my payments, the bank would foreclose on my house and my
tenants would have to be evicted. I am doing the right thing so that they have a
place to live.
I am a
landlord with an income property. The banks have not taken into consideration
that I am renting the house where I currently reside. My Allstate insurance
policy reflects my new status, as well. Because of this new status, I am not
eligible to qualify for any of the great interest rates being offered to
homeowners. I am told this is because I do not reside in the house that I own.
If there were no tenants, I might qualify except for the fact that my home has
been devalued so much that I probably wouldn’t be eligible for my present loan
amount.
We tried to
work with Wells Fargo Home Mortgage because we had heard mortgage companies were
willing to make some kind of adjustment on payments that would be mutually
beneficial. We counted on the idea that a bank would want to work with people
who, in good faith, wanted to hold onto their home. Yet after jumping through
all kinds of hoops, being disrespected by numerous people representing the
mortgage company, and spending additional money on registered letters that
provided all kinds of financial and personal information documenting how we
spend our money, we were officially denied because we didn’t want them calling
at my place of employment during business hours, making us "uncooperative.” Not
only did every call from Wells Fargo take much longer than necessary, answering
previously answered questions, but more importantly, my work ethic does not
allow me to conduct personal business on my employer’s dime.
I’ve been
designated a landlord with an income property yet I’m seriously considering
letting the bank foreclose on my house. I no longer can find any reason to keep
throwing good money after bad. And no one seems to want to work with me, least
of all Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. They have no incentive. In fact, they told us
that they could not do a loan modification until we are in default; in arrears
by at least two payments. So basically, we must exhaust our savings before they
will consider an adjustment, for a house that probably will never be valued at
its cost.
I’m a writer, not
a financial planner. And now I’m a landlord in possession of an income property.
I want to do what’s right, but I no longer know what that is. I have to laugh,
or else I might cry. |