New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About Nancy Salvato
Nancy Salvato has worked in the field of education since 1986, her experience spanning grades P-12 as a classroom teacher and as a clinical instructor at the postsecondary level. She is an experienced higher education administrator with demonstrated proficiency in accreditation and licensure, governmental relations, operations, curriculum and instruction, assessment, utilizing a student information system (SIS) and a learning management system (LMS). She received her undergraduate degree in History from Loyola University of Chicago and a master’s degree in Early Childhood Development from National Louis University. Post graduate study has focused the US Constitution, in particular, analyzing the historical, philosophical, and religious influences which culminated in this covenant amongst the citizens of this country and between those governed and those elected to office.  An accomplished writer, Nancy contributes regularly to The World and I, a publication of the Washington Times, The New Media Journal, Family Security Matters, and a host of new media publications.  Highlights of her career including being invited to the Department of Education to meet with then Secretary of Education, Rod Paige, being selected to participate in the National Academy for Civics and Government, and writing and publishing Keeping a Republic: An Argument for Sovereignty for and through her 501c3, BasicsProject.org.
Social Bookmarking
Recent Articles
For the Long Haul
A Brief History of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict
Should the Ends Justify the Means?
News Fast
Making Sense of the Legislative Branch...
The Shot Heard Round the World
Counting the Votes Before They Are In
‘Excuse Me...Can You Help Me with Some Change?’
For the General Welfare, or An Encroachment...
The Turkey That Is Obamanomics
An Abridgement of Constitutional Rights
Utopia or Dystopian Nightmare?
M-O-N-E-Y & Influence
Political Science 101: Power Breeds Corruption
Two Americas or One Nation with Liberty & Justice...
Setting New Standards with Online Education
Necessity is the Mother of Invention
Circumnavigating the Rule of Law
In Just 100 Days
Defining Article 2, Section 1 in Context
A Constitutionally Illiterate Congressional Leadership
Natural Born Citizens
Impoverishment, Elitism & Apathy
An Alternative to Impending Doom
Effective "Tools" in Education
Houston, We Have a Problem
Letting the Evidence Speak for Itself
The Right to Defend Sovereignty
Undermining Our Sovereignty from Without & Within
Risking Our Nation’s Sovereignty
True Patriots Put Country First
The Oath of a Citizen
The Constitution, Two Candidates & An Election
Article II, Section 1: Just Words

Nancy Salvato, Senior Editor

For the Long Haul
July 19, 2010

And it's two bare feet on the dashboard,
Young love in an old Ford,
Cheap shades, and a tattoo, and Yoohoo bottle on the floorboard.

– Kenny Chesney, Summertime, 2006)

 

Driving down the highway today, I noticed a little yellow ragtop, possibly an MGB Roadster that I would venture to guess was as old as I am! In any event, what caught my eye, besides how utterly cool this car was, was the idea that two of these sport cars could probably drive side by side in only one lane of highway. My wheels started to spin, not the car’s tires, but the figurative ones in my head.

 

I recalled reading that often, by the time a highway is expanded, its capacity in relation to the number of cars on the road is already diminished. According to David T. Hartgen and M. Gregory Fields of the Reason Foundation, "Nationwide, the number of lane-miles of severely congested roads is expected to increase from about 39,500 in 2003 to 59,700 in 2030.” Yet, right in front of me, I believed was a possible solution.

 

Navigating my "Compact SUV” just a few car lengths behind the object of transportation which grabbed my attention, I remembered my mother once remarking that she hated driving a small car behind a large truck because she couldn’t see what was up ahead. Even with the benefit of sitting higher off the ground, I, too, can relate to her experience. The man driving his little MGB couldn’t have been too worried about his line of vision, though; I imagined him breathing in the fresh air and enjoying the sun and the breeze on such a gorgeous day. Still, he was at a definite disadvantage if he found himself, God forbid, in a traffic accident. Perish the thought.

 

If we want to encourage people to drive smaller cars, a beginning would be to create two traffic lanes, smaller sized, for smaller vehicles. Twice as many cars could drive in the same amount of space –already designated for the road. My gears began to shift. Smaller vehicles generally utilize less gas. Perhaps compact cars could be configured to have a narrower body. Designers could be more creative with how seats are positioned. Trailers could be constructed to haul behind the vehicle, should a person desire additional space to hold bicycles, luggage, etc. Different size trailers could be purchased separately, or rented, should you have to transport a large load.

 

Trucks and vans and larger automobiles would be required to stay in their own two lanes. Eight lane highways would use the same amount of space as six lane highways. It would prove safer for those who drive small cars because there is less risk of having an accident with a larger vehicle. According to the article Are Small Cars Safer Now?, "Recent advances in both technology and crash testing, not to mention the use of new, stronger structural materials, have significantly improved the crash-worthiness of small cars.” Whether or not you feel any safer in light of the new technology, one thing is for certain; my little voice is telling me that the survival rate in an accident with a vehicle closer in size to your own would not be as destructive as one with a larger size vehicle.

 

For commuters who cannot or choose not to carpool, the option of driving to work in a car that is more efficient and takes up less space would be appealing. It certainly would be a boon in heavily congested, urban areas, where parking spaces are often at a premium. Again, twice as many cars would use half as much space.

 

Changing a major form of transportation and the infrastructure associated with it will likely generate jobs to implement these measures –and for a good cause. It is reasonable to expect that a smaller car would cost less money. People may choose to drive these types of cars when going it alone on the road, and switch to a larger vehicle when driving with a group of people to a destination.

 

I don’t presume to know all the answers, but outside the box thinking about our current modes of transportation might generate more viable options for the long haul, which could assist this country in alleviating its dependence on foreign oil.

 

Maybe you have a better idea. Do share. Perhaps someone with the skills, initiative, and funding will recognize your good idea and act on it. You’ll never know unless you try.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review