About
Frank Salvato Frank Salvatois
the Executive Director and Director of Terrorism Research for
BasicsProject.org
a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education
initiative. His writing has been recognized by the US House
International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for
Conflict Prevention. His organization, BasicsProject.org,
partnered in producing the original national symposium series
addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He is
a member of the International Analyst Network.
He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal.
Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News
Channel, and is a regular guest on talk radio including on The
Captain's America Radio Show airing on AM1220 WSRQ and on the
Internet catering to the US Armed Forces around the world and on
The Roth Show with Dr. Laurie Roth syndicated nationally on the
USA Radio Network. His
opinion-editorials have been published by The American
Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times & Human Events and
are syndicated nationally. He is occasionally quoted in The
Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking
engagements.
“Among the
calamities of war may be jointly numbered the diminution of the love of
truth, by the falsehoods which interest dictates and credulity
encourages.” – Samuel Johnson
Few things are more important in life than the facts and the truth.
Ironically, the quest for both has waned over generations. Today, fact
and truth suffer the narcissism of a generation of self-indulgent
ideologues who have sought to shape the world to their belief system,
doing so armed with little more than falsely elevated self-esteem. The
result has been to bring our great nation to a divide not seen since the
US Civil War; a divide of politics, ideology and culture; a divide that
threatens our
Republic’s very existence.
Samuel Johnson’s adage about truth being a casualty of war is not
exclusive to wars of nations, it is applicable to wars of all breeds:
cultural, violent, ideological and political. In fact, today’s American
culture places more worth on the delivery of words than on the
credibility of words. A gifted orator can mesmerize the citizenry into
reacting to a melodic tone and artful inflection and into caring little
for the accuracy of the statements being made. He can pass
impossibilities as realities using hollow promises, promises that serve
as distractions to truth and fact. Truth be told, today, the American
public is more interested in being captivated by the “bright shiny”
distraction, being entertained by the slickly delivered sleight-of-hand
rhetoric of “hope” and “change,” than they are in gathering the facts
in an effort to better understand reality.
Mainstream Media Nowhere are truth and fact more
dispensable than in today’s mainstream media. Where in times past the
term journalist elicited respect and an aura of daring and integrity,
today the public views “journalists” with as much contempt as
politicians and shyster lawyers, and rightly so. Where journalists of
days gone by used to hold to a code of ethic in delivering the truth,
today “journalists” pro-actively advocate and editorialize the news.
An excellent example of the mainstream media’s contempt for the facts
and the truth can be examined in their coverage of the 2008 presidential
election between then Senator Obama and Senator John McCain. On issue
after issue the members of the Fourth Estate refused to question the
assertions of Mr. Obama. They refused to examine the effects of his
relationships – both past and present – with radical operatives and
thinkers. And they refused to scrutinize his theories on policy and the
reality of his political inexperience. Conversely, the “journalists” of
the mainstream media pored over every aspect of John McCain’s life; from
the way he dressed to his fidelity in marriage, from his age to his
temperament, no matter what truth Senator McCain espoused it was
rendered inconsequential by the media elite in deference to Senator
Obama’s “bright” and “shiny” oratory skills and his faux promises of
“hope” and “change,” a recycled campaign strategy from the Clinton
campaigns.
The mainstream media’s assault on truth and fact continues in its
unwillingness to forgo omissions in reporting, or “non-reporting.” By
omitting certain topics and examinations of specific queries the
“journalists” of the mainstream media effectively compromise fact and
truth by painting an inaccurate picture of the issues in question.
A good example of pro-active non-reporting was on display recently when
FOX News anchor Sheppard Smith covered the shootings at the Holocaust
Museum in Washington, DC. Instead of delivering the facts of a
horrendous story devoid of opinion and slant, Mr. Smith, in an attempt
to marginalize legitimate queries by a large number of citizens, tried
to paint those concerned with
President Obama’s satisfaction of Article II, Section 1 of the US
Constitution as radical hate-mongers and homicidal extremists. In an
emotional outburst Mr. Smith declared, “It has to stop.” Yet, neither
Mr. Smith himself, nor any of his FOX News brethren have bothered to
examine the issue in earnest. If they had they would have come to
understand that there is no enforcement vehicle for Article II, Section
1 of the US Constitution, none, and that the Certificate of Live Birth
displayed by Mr. Obama’s campaign was not only not the equivalent
of a birth certificate but that it was digitally altered. By Mr. Smith’s
non-reporting of this very real issue – and by his attempts to deter the
American public from understanding the facts and the truth – he has
effectively helped to conceal the facts and the truth on this matter
from the American public.
In a profession that receives constitutional protection so that it can
freely tend to its duties, no greater disservice can be done to the
Constitution than to manipulate, manufacture and/or keep the truth from
the American people. Today’s mainstream media has abdicated its
constitutional responsibility to counter government through public
examination. In its current form, it is difficult to justify continued
unfettered constitutional protection for the mainstream media.
The Palestinian Conflict & The
“Religion of Peace” Two of the more troublesome
issues where fact and truth are concerned are the issues of Islam and
the Palestinian conflict. Both advocates and detractors are guilty of
using propaganda in the extreme to advance their cause and because of
that the facts and the truth suffer greatly.
When truth is served, there has never been a country called
Palestine and, therefore, the notion of a “Palestinian people” is
one of generality, not specificity. Palestine, also referred to as
Judea, referred to a region which encompassed the land between the
Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River. More specifically, the region
known as Palestine or Judea (these terms come from the time of the Roman
Empire, mind you) includes Israel, Gaza and the West Bank, and parts of
Syria, Lebanon and Jordan.
Where there was never a country or kingdom called Palestine, there was a
Kingdom of Israel dating back to at least 1020BC. This kingdom was
ruled by Saul, its first king, and the Israelites established Jerusalem
as its capitol. It wasn’t until between 722BC and 720BC that the Kingdom
of Israel fell to the Assyrians.
The argument that today’s Gazans and West Bank citizens are the rightful
inhabitants to all of Israel is a disingenuous one. The greater mass of
land that comprised ancient Palestine lies within the borders of Jordan
and Syria. Yet the inhabitants of Gaza and the West Bank never petition
the world for the right of return to these lands. They focus,
exclusively, on the land of Israel which the Jews first inhabited in
1020BC.
Fact and truth are further compromised by the notion that Islam, in its
fundamental form, is a “religion of peace.” The history of Islam, dating
back to the days of Muhammad in 570AD, is one of obedience, oppression
and conquest by the sword. Throughout its existence – and throughout the
myriad attempts to establish a global
Caliphate – Muslims loyal to the teaching of Muhammad, adhering to
strict interpretations of the Quran and Hadith, spread the religion of
Islam through violent conquest that witnessed the occupation of lands
throughout the Middle East and from Europe to Asia to Africa.
Further, Muhammad, as his following grew, became increasingly hateful of
the Jews setting to religious teaching the need to slay the Jews so that
the Day of Judgment could arrive:
“The hour [Judgment Day] will
not come until the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them. A Jew will
[then] hide behind a rock or a tree, and the rock or tree will call upon
the Muslim: 'O Muslim, O slave of Allah! There is a Jew behind me, come
and kill him!” – Sahih No. 5203
and Ahmad ibn Hanbal's Musnad, No. 9029
But it wasn’t exclusively the Jews that Muhammad targeted, it was anyone
who dared not to submit to his religion:
“And when the forbidden months
have passed, slay the idolaters wherever you find them and take them
captive, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of
ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakaat, then
leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful.”
– The Quran, Sura 9, Chapter 5
These are but two of a multitude of teachings from the Islamic faith
that prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Islam is anything but a
“religion of peace.” In fact, the more devote, the more fundamentalist
the Muslim, the more literal the interpretation of the Quran and Hadith.
But you don’t have to become an Islamic scholar to understand the
violent tendencies of the Islamic faith. All you have to do is to
honestly examine any and every act of terrorism, every act of violence
in the name of a religion taking place around the world today to
understand that the overwhelming numbers of incidents are perpetrated by
members of the Islamic faith and in the name of their faith.
Hope & Change Truth and fact are bastardized
on a constant and continual basis in the political arena, especially in
the United States. From false campaign promises to the employment of
spin doctors and media gurus, politicians, especially American
politicians, have earned the distrust and disdain of the American
people. Where the halls of government were once filled with statesmen,
today, with rare exception, they are filled with professional political
opportunists who put the well-being of their political party and the
importance of their political ideology above their constitutional duties
to serve their constituencies.
Examples of how truth and fact are routinely cast aside come from the
Obama Administration and today’s Congress, although each and every
administration since the days of the Founders and Framers is guilty of
compromising truth and fact to some extent.
While campaigning, President Obama promised unprecedented transparency
in government. He promised that an Obama Administration would exist in a
time of post-partisan politics in Washington DC. He promised to close
Guantanamo Bay immediately, to cease the military tribunals for
Guantanamo detainees, to halt the NSA surveillance activity, to close
foreign rendition centers and to provide a tax cut to 95% of the
American people. Today, we are witnessing one of the most controlling
and partisan administrations in US history. Guantanamo is still open.
Tribunals are still functioning. Renditions are still taking place. The
NSA program is (thankfully) still in place. And We the People, while
receiving a pittance of a tax break, now own several banks and General
Motors.
If that wasn’t enough of a slap in the face to truth and fact, when
President Obama made the protocol error of bowing to the King of Saudi
Arabia his spin doctors told the American people he was “reaching down
to shake the hand of a much shorter man,” a claim that flies in the face
of the facts. And when the Oval Office okayed a “photo-op” flight for
one of the presidential jets (it is only called Air Force One when the
president is aboard) – possibly to reward potentate high-profile
campaign donors – we were told by his office that it was to capture a
picture of the presidential aircraft alongside the Statue of Liberty.
Just down Pennsylvania Avenue, Nancy Pelosi, upon taking up the gavel of
the Speaker of the House, insisted that she would preside over the most
transparent and ethical Congress in the history of the United States.
Instead, we are witnessing a barrage of ethical issues with her party
members and a congressional leadership that has usurped the committee
process to craft partisan legislation behind closed doors, including the
massive $787 Billion “Stimulus Bill,” which 45% of the American people
now believe we should abandon.
Add to the mix Speaker Pelosi’s obvious lie that she had never been
informed of the use of enhanced interrogation techniques – a claim
debunked by her fellow intelligence committee members (at the time) and
current CIA Director Leon Panetta (a Democrat from California) – and
that the CIA routinely lies to Congress and we witness the assassination
of truth and fact on Capitol Hill. All that’s missing is the grassy
knoll.
Climate Change The poster child for the demise
of truth and fact comes in the person of former Vice President Al Gore.
He and his political opportune faux environmentalists have
advanced their ideology at the expense of fact and truth and in
doing so have crippled true science and the process of scientific
research.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a panel assembled by the
United Nations and comprised of scientists employed by political and
ideological organizations, put forth a report that returns a political
verdict on the effects of human beings on the Earth’s climate. Because
the panel was seated by a political organization by a conglomerate of
other political organizations, common sense mandates that the result
would be heavily influenced by politics.
Regardless of this fact, Mr. Gore and his supporters – many who stand to
make billions if not tens or hundreds of billions of dollars from the
newly created carbon credit market needed to institutionalize the
marketing of carbon emissions – insist that there is a “consensus” in
the scientific community and that anyone questioning their “consensus”
is akin to a Holocaust denier. The big problem with this assertion is
that there are a
growing and impressive number of climatologists, meteorologists and
climate scientists that are begging to differ with the IPCC’s conclusion
and Al Gore’s theories.
Further, one of the core fundamental principles of science is to quest
to disprove, which means a true scientists isn’t questing for consensus
at all, he or she would be questing to find the flaw in the theory. The
IPCC scientists and the Gore sycophants do no such thing, instead
expending great amounts of energy, time and money to defend their flawed
“consensus.”
If truth was so important to Mr. Gore and his gaggle of sycophants,
wouldn’t they be joining in the search for any plausible flaw in their
logic, especially, as Mr. Gore maintains, when the world hangs in the
balance? Not when there are billions of dollars to be made.
The attack on truth and fact doesn’t end with these few examples. Truth
and fact are marginalized in just about every aspect of modern life.
From special interest education groups rewriting the facts of history to
suit an ideological agenda in the classroom to the infusing of falsely
established self-esteem in our children, truth and fact are routinely
cast aside in today’s society because they are incompatible with the “Me
First” Generation, the Baby Boomer If-It-Feels-Good-Do-It philosophy.
Our modern American culture has cast aside the stable societal
foundation of truth and fact, honor and civic responsibility for moral
relativism and all the compromise it provides. We do so because it is
more convenient and allows us to play the victim when the repercussions
of our self-indulgence come to bear. Because of this we feed on it like
mother’s milk.
It takes a moral and civically responsible people to insist on the facts
and the truth, and it takes courage in the face of societal and special
interest pressure, especially today, to hold true these principles.
Sadly, alarmingly, incredibly, We the People don’t seem to
possess that courage today. In fact, it can be successfully argued that
the Baby Boomer Generation has been
a miserable failure and an experiment in narcissism gone wildly
awry. Our revolutionary Fathers, our Founders and Framers, those of the
Union and the Confederacy, those who served in the War to End All Wars
and the greatest generation would, like General Patton, slap our faces
in disgust for our weakness...and we would deserve it.