About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Recent Articles
Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
Hostile Alien Case Exposes Danger of Activist...
The Age of Arrogance
Lenin Lite, Perhaps?
Where’s the Guilt?
In the Matter of Public v. Stimulus Bill
Bigger Than the Bacon Explosion
Where Bill O’Reilly’s Going Wrong
Dear Camille
Liberals, Israel & Wolves
Sarkozy, Israel & The Neurotic Mind
The Problem with Hope
The Winter Solstice & the Triumph of Reason
Bush & Obama: Slouching Us Toward Disaster...
Beware the Recovery Plan
New Deal Not Such a Big Deal?
Republicans & The Courts
That Flatulent Thing Called Experience
Can Obama Call Spirits from the Vasty Deep?
A Million Calls, Ten Million Voters
Liberals Boiling, Conservatives Not, But...
The Merely Human Messiah and the Sea
Fully Understanding the Bill Ayres "Distraction”
How McCain Can Deliver a Last Round KO
Obama & The English Language
Are Americans Really Open to Obama’s New Ideas?
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady


AJ DiCintio

Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
March 23, 2009
 

Main Street conservatives were as shocked and angered as everyone else when the nation suffered the double punch in the gut delivered by the explosion of the fraudulently inflated housing balloon and the collapse of financial institutions that stupidly speculated on enormous bundles of toxic debt.

 

But never forgetting that Congress and federal bureaucracies were fully complicit in creating both debacles (having ordered, funded, and cheerled for a free lunch "ownership society”), those conservatives (including your humble writer) also reacted by warning that liberal politicians would not miss an opportunity to take advantage of the people’s pain, fear, anger, and uncertainty.

 

Unfortunately, however, liberals didn’t just seize the moment; they prevailed by convincing a majority of the public that it has "no other medicine but only hope.”

 

With that success in hand, they swept to victory in the Election of ’08 and since have enacted the first parts of an economic/social agenda aimed at transforming America into an amalgam of Sweden and France in one "Big Bang” of heretofore unimaginable, multi-trillion dollar governmental expansion — the cost of this liberty and prosperity crushing nanny state to be paid with dangerous, unsustainable borrowing today and suffocating tax increases tomorrow.

 

Now, since the wisely traditionalist folks mentioned at the outset still know that Obama is "selling make believe” (this outstanding example of Plain English from country singer John Rich), the relevant question today is this:

 

Are the majority of Americans who bought Obama’s fantasy now willing to confront reality; or will they continue to repress the truth of Ben Franklin’s aphorism, "He that lives upon hope will die fasting”?

 

It would be a very good thing if the answers to those questions were "yes” and "no,” respectively. However, they are not, though polls reveal much to be encouraged about.

 

First, the worst news. A recent CNN poll finds that by a 55%-43% margin, Americans think Obama is trying to do too much at once. However, both CNN and the Pew Research Center find solid public support for many (but not all) of the president’s key policy initiatives.

 

For example, CNN finds 59% agreeing with "how the president is handling the economy.” In turn, Pew reports a 59% job approval rating for Obama, with 56% of the public agreeing that his stimulus bill is a "good idea.”

 

Given the devils that lurk in the details of Obama’s vision, it is important to debate why the public is reacting so positively to a roll of the dice intended to establish Washington’s politicians as the moral, economic, and social lodestone toward which every citizen’s eye should turn and knee bend.

 

However, what is indisputable is that currently a solid majority of Americans are not concerned about the harmful consequences of Obama’s "change we can believe in.”

 

That is disturbing news. However, it should not be taken as irreversible because, as polling also reveals, the public isn’t buying what Obama is selling hook, line, sinker, rod, reel, and boat. Rather, it is forming its attitudes about his policies issue by issue.

 

Combine that fact with the reality that people haven’t yet seen — and, thus, haven’t yet had the opportunity to evaluate — hugely expensive, powerfully controversial proposals Obama has yet to offer and there is reason for optimism regarding political buyer’s remorse.

 

Now, on to some good news.

 

As the current explosion over the midnight written, blindly voted AIG bailout bill reveals, no deal in the current tsunami of federal deals regarding spending, bailing, rescuing, buying, guaranteeing, and borrowing is ever truly done, thereby permitting the president to move on to the next item on his agenda in an atmosphere devoid of angry questions and challenges.

 

And there’s even better news.

 

The Pew poll’s 59% approval rating represents a 5% drop from February’s 64%. In addition, Pew finds the president’s disapproval number at 26%, up 9% in one month.

 

Happily, part of the rising disapproval may be due to the fact that 44% of the public now believe Obama is listening more to liberals of his party than to its moderates. (In January only 34% said Obama was giving both his ears to the Democratic left wing.)

 

Happily, too, the Pew and CNN findings aren’t isolated. For example, Rasmussen supports them fully, showing Obama at 56% approval, 43% disapproval.

 

And that’s not all. Basing their conclusions upon the totality of Rasmussen polling, Douglas Schoen (a former Democratic consultant) and Scott Rasmussen conclude that "The American people are coming to express increasingly significant doubts about [Obama’s] initiatives, and most likely support a different agenda and different policies from those that [his] administration has advanced.”

 

Finally, some truly excellent news is found in Pew’s numbers regarding the "pragmatic approach” with which Americans view government.

 

Specifically, 48% of Americans currently favor "smaller government/fewer services” (up from 42% in October ’08) while 40% favor "bigger government/more services (down from 43% five months ago).

 

Moreover, 70% of citizens believe the nation is "better off in free-market economy even [with] severe ups and downs.”

 

Yes, despite the battles that lie ahead for us conservatives and our moderate/independent friends — including Senator Evan Bayh, whom Politico refers to as "a leader of a 15-member caucus of conservative and centrist Democrats” — we can be comforted by news of a 70% landslide in which the American public rejects socialism (European style or otherwise), class warfare, and every other –ism or expression of nonsense that stifles liberty, individualism, innovation, and prosperity.

 

Comforted, indeed, for the 70% figure is certain to rocket through the roof when millions of young people realize that buying the president’s make believe means becoming card-carrying members of the club long populated by their European brothers and sisters, with all the perquisites of membership fully guaranteed, including living at home with mom and dad at least until the age of 30 — perhaps 35 or more if Obama succeeds in selling America a bang as big as the one that reverberates throughout his most audacious, hope-filled dreams.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review