New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Recent Articles
Lessons from Hurricane Camille
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals

Click here for more articles by AJ DiCintio

About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.

Click here to email AJ DiCintio

AJ DiCintio

The Love Behind the Most
Rotten Golden Parachute of All
October 2, 2008

We expect it from the likes of Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi, but when we hear conservatives from George Bush to David Brooks speak as if it’s a scientific fact that the only solution to the mortgage/liquidity mess is to put the geniuses of the federal government in charge of $700 billion of the people’s money, we immediately detect a powerful stink in the air.

Yes, something smells rotten when a gang of politicians, bureaucrats, and CEO’s tell us they are so certain about their solution to a problem (which their rapacity created) that there is no need to consider competing ideas.

No need to seek advice from entrepreneurs who know a few things about finance, real estate, and business in general. ("We know Barney Frank. Barney Frank is a friend of ours. And neither Donald Trump nor Steve Wynn is half a Barney Frank.”)

No need to worry about waste, theft, and rampant corruption when ACORN loving Democrats; Wall Street worshipping Republicans; greedy executives; and a million consultants and lobbyists get a sniff of a mountain of cash so high and so thoroughly entangled in red tape that they believe no mere mortal, let alone a Washington bureaucrat, will ever notice that its height is reduced by a few billion.

No need to worry if we just trust the prodigal monstrosity that is the federal government.

No need to worry about anything.

What is that except a pile of rot that ignores every common sense reality regarding the love of power and the love of money, Washington’s most deadly evils.

Unfortunately, many Americans are unaware of the connection between those evils and the bailout bill, a sad and dangerous fact that the Center for Responsive Politics labors mightily to change.

According to the Center, "In this election cycle, Democrats backing Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's proposal have collected 78 percent more from the finance, insurance and real estate sector [FIRE] than those in their caucus who opposed it and, over time, 88 percent more.”

"The 65 Republicans who backed the bill have collected $1,078,533 from the finance sector in their careers and an average of $185,461 toward this election. The 133 Republicans who led the opposition to the bailout have collected, on average, $705,297 over their careers in Congress and $150,381 in this election cycle alone.”

"...[FIRE] has been the top campaign contributor in federal politics, giving more than $2 billion to federal candidates and political parties since 1989.

Which Senators have received the most money from the FIRE sector in the current election cycle? The Center reports these numbers:

Barack Obama, $25,149,976; John McCain, $22,345,205; Hillary Clinton, $21,571,625.

Surprise, surprise, the cycle’s three top presidential contenders.

Now, guess which Senator comes in at #4. Not sure? Think of the Senator whom Fannie, Freddie, and ACORN love as a brother. Need another hint? O.K. He’s the top Senate Democrat negotiating the bailout bill. Yes, you’ve got it!

Chris Dodd, $5,999,668

(If you’re wondering about blue-collar but black robe activist judge loving Joe Biden, he’s right up there at #8 with $1,594,344.)

Now to the FIRE amounts the Center reports for selected House members, with notations by this author regarding how those members voted on the bailout bill.

#1 Ron Paul ($1,334,821). Alas, $1.3 million wasn’t enough to buy Ron, who burned FIRE with a "no.”

#2 Charles Rangel ($1,208,295). Charlie, a "man of the people,” heads the powerful Ways and Means committee. Charlie is also a small real estate player who consistently forgot to report rental income from his property in the Dominican Republic to the IRS until the NY Post recently jogged his memory. Charlie voted "yes” — most likely as a favor to his hugely big real estate friends who have hugely bigger problems than he does.

#3 Rahm Emanuel ($1,007,325). Rahm learned everything he knows about real estate deals in the Bill and Hill administration and now serves as Speaker Pelosi’s chief helpmate on things financial. Without having his arm twisted a bit or being subjected to even one spank with a Whitewater board, he voted "yes.”

#4 Paul "Earmark” Kanjorski ($888,298). This Democrat from PA who always puts country second (or lower) voted "yes.”

#9 Barney Frank ($783,898). Mr. Barney F. F. Frank ("Freddie Fannie”) is the raving Massachusetts liberal who was betrayed by 12 "no” voting Democrats of his own committee but somehow mistook them for Republicans. Barney voted "yes” before dashing off to stick his motoring mouth in front of the nearest television camera.

#14 Steny Hoyer ($666,549). The Majority Leader just can’t wait to whip President Barack Obama’s tax and spending bills through the "People’s House.” Right now, he’s busy appearing in every bailout photo that features friends Nancy and Barney. Of course, Steny stuck up a "yes” vote.

So there it is, the truth about what’s behind the golden parachute proposed by Bush and amended by Congress. How appropriate that it gets gilded, folded, packed, and deployed by our most "experienced” and "knowledgeable” legislators, that is, those who know everything there is to know about how to pull the strings that will open into Washington’s already fetid atmosphere a rotten, reeking pit of cash undreamed of in their wildest power and money loving dreams.

Social Bookmarking
       
       

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review