Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






"We have a Department of Labor nominee [Tom Perez, pictured] that has a record of ideological, polarizing leadership," Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said ahead of the vote. "I believe Mr. Perez's record disqualifies him from running this or any other federal agency."
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Labor Secretary Nominee
Narrowly Survives Senate Vote

The Hill
The Senate voted 60-40 Wednesday, narrowly ending debate on the controversial nomination of Tom Perez to be secretary of Labor.

Republicans agreed to hold an up-or-down vote on his nomination as part of a deal to avoid Senate rule changes limiting the minority's right to filibuster executive branch nominees.

The close vote -- 60 votes were needed to move the nomination forward -- came after several GOP senators complained that Perez has engaged in "ethically questionable" actions while heading the Civil Rights division of the Department of Justice.

"We have a Department of Labor nominee that has a record of ideological, polarizing leadership," Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said ahead of the vote. "I believe Mr. Perez's record disqualifies him from running this or any other federal agency."

GOP Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Susan Collins (Ri-ME), Bob Corker (R-TN), Mark Kirk (R-IL), John McCain (Ri-AZ) and Lisa Murkowski (Ri-AS) voted with Democrats to advance Perez in his nomination process. There will be 30 hours of debate before a final vote on Perez's nomination unless time is yielded back, meaning the vote could happen as early as Thursday evening.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) urged his Republican colleagues to ignore the deal made to allow up-or-down votes on several of Obama's executive branch nominees.

"This is the Labor department," Rubio shouted on the Senate floor. "I am shocked that there are members of my own conference that are willing to go forward on this nominee."

Rubio said Perez failed to answer lawmakers' questions during his confirmation hearing.

"We're being asked to vote to invoke cloture on the nomination of someone who has open contempt to a congressional subpoena," Rubio said. "This is wrong. How can we possibly -- I don't care what deal was cut -- how can we move forward on someone who hasn't provided information asked for by a congressional committee?"

Sen. Tom Harkin (P-IA) said Rubio's claim that Perez is violating a congressional subpoena is "just plain wrong." Harkin said Perez submitted the 35 emails in question to the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee and that the Department of Justice now has the emails from his personal account on file.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 07/17/2013








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server