Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






The improvements to the newest version of what is the Pentagon's largest conventional bomb, the 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator, are meant to address US and Israeli concerns that Fordow couldn't be destroyed from the air.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Report: US Can Destroy Iran's
Underground Nuclear Facility

IsraelNationalNews.com
The Pentagon has redesigned its biggest "bunker buster" bomb with more advanced features intended to enable it to destroy Iran's most heavily fortified and defended nuclear site, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

US officials see development of the weapon as critical to convincing Israel that the US has the ability to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb if diplomacy fails, and also that Israel's military can't do that on its own, the report said.

According to the Wall Street Journal, several times in recent weeks, American officials, seeking to demonstrate US capabilities, showed Israeli military and civilian leaders a secret Air Force video of an earlier version of the bomb hitting its target in high-altitude testing, and explained what had been done to improve it, according to diplomats who were present.

In the video, the weapon can be seen penetrating the ground within inches of its target, followed by a large underground detonation, people who have seen the footage told the Wall Street Journal.

The newest version of what is the Pentagon's largest conventional bomb, the 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, has adjusted fuses to maximize its burrowing power, upgraded guidance systems to improve its precision and high-tech equipment intended to allow it to evade Iranian air defenses in order to reach and destroy the Fordow nuclear enrichment complex, which is buried under a mountain near the Iranian city of Qom.

The upgraded MOP designed for Fordow hasn't been dropped from a plane yet.

The improvements are meant to address US and Israeli concerns that Fordow couldn't be destroyed from the air. Overcoming that obstacle could also give the West more leverage in diplomatic efforts to convince Iran to curtail its nuclear program.

"Hopefully we never have to use it," said a senior US official familiar with the development of the new version. "But if we had to, it would work."

Iran admitted in the past it was moving more centrifuge machines for enriching uranium to the underground Fordow facility, the existence of which only came to light after it was identified by Western intelligence agencies in September 2009. The UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, has confirmed that Iran begun enriching uranium at the plant.

Fordow has long been thought to be a target that would be difficult if not impossible for the US to destroy with conventional weapons. In January 2012, US officials disclosed they didn't think their largest bomb could penetrate to the centrifuges within the complex, where Iran refines fuel it maintains is intended for civilian use but the US and its allies believe is destined for a nuclear-weapons program.

At the time, the Pentagon had spent about $330 million to develop about 20 of the bombs, and sought additional funding to make them more effective, reported the Wall Street Journal. That money came through; so far, the Defense Department has now spent more than $400 million on the bombs, which are built by Boeing Co., BA +1.46% according to government officials.

US intelligence agencies have concluded that Iran's nuclear sites are so well fortified that Israel's military alone can't deliver what a US official called "a knockout blow." Even if Israel were able to obtain its own MOP--and US officials said they haven't offered it to its ally--US officials said Israel doesn't have stealth aircraft capable of carrying the bomb to its target deep inside Iran.

US officials said they believe the enhanced US bunker-busting capability decreases the chances that Israel will launch a unilateral bombing campaign against Iran this year and possibly next year, buying more time for the Obama administration to pursue diplomacy after Iran holds elections in June. Israeli officials declined to comment.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said this week that Iran is continuing to progress to the "red line" of nuclear capability which he set during his United Nations speech in September.

He added, however, that there is still time to stop Tehran from crossing that red line.

A top defense official told Channel 10 News this week that despite appearances to the contrary, Israel's military option on Iran was very much alive, and that Iran was reaching the point where construction of a nuclear weapon was within reach.

The official, whose identity was kept under wraps, is considered a highly placed, highly reliable source. The official said that Iran has in recent months "dramatically" increased its uranium enrichment capabilities, the result of the installation of new centrifuges. With the new equipment, Iran should be able to soon enrich as much as 200 kilos of uranium. With that amount, the source said, Iran would be able to easily equip a nuclear arsenal.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 05/04/2013

Editor's Note: Given that this information should never have gotten out, one has to ask, is this propaganda aimed at moving Iran to spend precious resources in refortifying its facilities, thus buying more time for the Obama Administration to solidify a counter-action? Or is this propaganda aimed at allowing Obama himself more time to exit the White House, thus kicking this can down the road? Either way, if this is propaganda it was a stupid move...








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server