April 30, 2013
What kind of idiot would write, "Until we fully understand what turned two brothers who allegedly perpetrated the Boston Marathon bombings into murderers, it is hard to make any policy recommendation other than this: We need to redouble our efforts to make America stronger and healthier so it remains a vibrant counterexample to whatever bigoted ideology may have gripped these young men."
"Whatever bigoted ideology"? This is what Thomas L. Friedman of The New York Times wrote on April 21.
Friedman had spent years in Lebanon, first as a reporter for the United Press International from 1979 to 1981. From 1975 to 1990, Lebanon was convulsed by a civil war between its Christian population and Palestinian forces aligned with Syrian-backed Muslims. In 1981 he was hired by the New York Times and won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon after years of Katyusha rocket attacks on northern Israel. He also won the George Polk Award for Foreign Reporting.
He would serve as the Times Bureau Chief in Jerusalem from June 1984 to February 1988, receiving a second Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the first Palestinian Intifada. He witnessed Islamic terrorism first hand and learned nothing from it.
If that is not sufficiently moronic, his column, How to Put America Back Together Again was devoted to "healing our economy" and his answer was higher taxes in general and a carbon tax in particular. "We need to raise more revenues, in the least painful way possible."
No, Mr. Friedman, what we need to do is stop spending more than the nation takes in by reducing spending, fixing the tax code, and reforming entitlement programs, but that is never part of the liberal agenda.
He called for a "'radical center--one much more willing to suggest radically new ideas to raise revenues...the best place to start is with a carbon tax." This tax is based on the false assertion that greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide, are causing global warming and/or climate change. It would raise the cost of the use of energy for everyone. It would raise revenue for "investment" in more failed solar energy companies and other crony capitalism that has become the hallmark of the Obama administration.
"A phased-in carbon tax of $20 to $25 a ton could raise around $1 trillion over ten years, as we each pay a few more dimes and quarters for every gallon of gasoline or hour of electricity." This is easy to say if you are a highly paid Times columnist, author, and public speaker. It is also a formula for inflicting pain on an economy that is dependent for its growth on the use of energy; a nation in which its total recoverable oil, along with Mexico, exceeds 1.7 trillion barrels. That's the equivalent, based on current use, of enough oil for the next 242 years.
He covered his proposal saying "Yes, a carbon tax is not painless. We would have to, and easily can, cushion the poor from its impact." Nonsense! Even the poor must purchase gasoline and electricity. And the poor to whom he refers includes the millions of Americans who are unemployed because of Obama administration policies that restrict economy growth. Obama isn't helping the poor; he is increasing their numbers and increasing more government spending and dependency with food stamps and comparable programs.
Obamacare is already causing companies and businesses to not hire and to put existing staff on a part-time basis. It is driving up the cost of health insurance premiums. It will cause hospitals to close and physicians to stop practicing.
This is typical of the pie-in-the-sky liberal answer to all problems; suck more money out of the pockets of Americans in the name of "infrastructure, preschool education, community colleges and research..." Preschool education is liberal code for earlier indoctrination of a new generation raised to believe that America is the cause of the terrorism directed against it.
His column was laudatory of President Obama and his recent budget proposal, the first since he took office in 2009, but America is suffering as the result of his policies and Friedman thinks he is the answer to our problems, not the cause.
How can a reporter look at Obama's America where one out of every five families is on food stamps, the actual number of unemployed is estimated to be twenty million or more, and see a nation in need of more taxes? Little wonder one of his books is titled "The World is Flat."
A reporter who spent years covering the war between Muslims and Christians in Lebanon and then later reported from an Israel under siege from the PLO, still cannot comprehend "whatever bigoted ideology" is killing Americans and others around the world and should not be writing columns giving out advice on raising our taxes in the name of an utterly deceitful, environmental attack on energy use.
To understand everything that is wrong with liberalism in America, by all means, read Thomas L. Friedman.
The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...
The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.