Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






The number of lenders quoting non-FHA loans with down payments of 5%-10% is almost double what it was two years ago.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Mortgages with 10% or Less Down On the Rise
USA Today
In another sign of the housing market's brightening outlook, more home buyers are discovering conventional loans with down payments well below the 20% or higher levels of recent years.

Until recently, many borrowers had to go through a government guaranteed loan program, such as the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or the Department of Veterans Affairs, to get a mortgage with less than a 10% down payment.

Now, a growing number of lenders are offering such mortgages without the backing of a government guarantee -- the definition of a conventional loan.

Loans with down payments between 5% and 10% accounted for almost a fifth of the conventional loan offers that lenders made on the LendingTree online exchange in the first quarter, according to LendingTree.

That's up from just 6% of conventional loan offers in last year's first quarter and only 1% of the offers in 2011's first three months.

A similar trend shows up on the Zillow Mortgage Marketplace. The number of lenders quoting non-FHA loans with down payments of 5%-10% is almost double what it was two years ago, Zillow says.

That can be a big help. On a $200,000 mortgage, a 20% down payment is $40,000, but 5% is only $10,000.

"For years, it's been FHA or nothing," for the low-down-payment borrower, says Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance. "This shift is a sign that mortgage origination is loosening up."

The industry is still a long way from the easy-lending standards that caused the housing bust. Borrowers now must show a strong credit history and documented income to get loans.

While the FHA requires just 3.5% down, its annual insurance premiums have more than doubled in the past two years. The last increase took hold April 1.

The higher costs are "causing a shift back toward conventional loans," says Cameron Findlay, chief economist at Discover Home Loans.

He expects that to continue as FHA rules tighten, raising costs for borrowers.

Lenders generally don't make home loans that they can't resell to mortgage giants Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

While Fannie Mae will buy a loan with as little as 3% down, and Freddie Mac at 5%, loans with less than 20% down require borrowers to also pay for private mortgage insurance.

When the housing market crashed, the private mortgage industry lost billions and such insurance was tough to get. Now, that industry is recovering and the cost for private mortgage insurance has dropped for borrowers with higher credit scores.

More home borrowers are deciding it's better to pay for insurance instead of putting 20% down, says Matt Johnson, loan officer at Sterling Bank in Seattle.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 04/14/2013

Editor's Note: Yup...let's make sure to blow-up that bubble again so we can repeat the same stupid financial mistakes of the past...








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server