Front Page
NMJ Search
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House

The "Firearm Risk Protection Act" requires gun buyers to have "a qualified liability insurance policy" before they are able to legally purchase a firearm.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Progressives, Democrats Propose
Mandatory Liability Insurance for Gun Owners

The Daily Caller
A contingent of liberal Democrats in Congress is proposing a new federal gun control idea: mandatory liability insurance for gun owners.

When Rep. Carolyn Maloney (P-NY), introduced the legislation last month with eight other Democrats, she boasted that it is "the first bill to require liability insurance of gun buyers nationwide."

Maloney's "Firearm Risk Protection Act" requires gun buyers to have "a qualified liability insurance policy" before they are able to legally purchase a firearm.

It also calls for the federal government to impose a fine as much as $10,000 if a gun owner doesn't have insurance on a firearm purchased after the bill goes into effect.

"It shall be unlawful for a person who owns a firearm purchased on or after the effective date of this subsection not to be covered by a qualified liability insurance policy," the bill text reads.

The bill would also make it a federal crime to sell a firearm to anyone without insurance.

"For too long, gun victims and society at large have borne the brunt of the costs of gun violence," Maloney said as she introduced the legislation. "My bill would change that by shifting some of that cost back onto those who own the weapons."

Chris Cox, the executive director of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, told The Daily Caller that the bill is "ridiculous on its face, as it presumes law-abiding gun owners are guilty for merely exercising a fundamental, constitutional right."

"But it does reveal what Rep. Maloney really thinks about honest people who believe in the right to keep and bear arms," Cox said.

The bill defines "qualified liability insurance" as a policy that covers the "purchaser specifically for losses resulting from use of the firearm while it is owned by the purchaser." Buyers would have to obtain insurance from a company licensed or authorized by a state insurance regulatory authority.

Exceptions would be made for law enforcement, military and employees of government departments and agencies.

In the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, President Barack Obama and top Democrats have been pushing to pass a gun control measure through Congress. A federal liability insurance mandate for gun owners, while debated in some states, is not a proposal that has been seriously considered on the Hill yet.

Others who have signed on as co-sponsors of the legislation include: Rep. Keith Ellison (P-MN), Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (P-DC), Rep. Michael Capuano (P-MA), Rep. Jim Moran (P-VA), Rep. Bobby Rush (P-IL), Rep. Nikki Tsongas (D-MA), Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) and Rep. Earl Blumenauer (P-OR).

With many states requiring drivers to carry auto insurance, Maloney argues that, "We have a long history of requiring insurance for high-risk products -- and no one disputes that guns are dangerous."

"While many individual states are debating this issue now, it makes more sense for Congress to establish a national requirement to allow the insurance markets to begin to price the risks involved consistently nationwide," she said.


Editor's Note: And this is how Progressives "nudge" their way into marginalizing the Second Amendment: Don't have gun insurance, can't legally have a gun...BTW, we mark Progressives with a denoted "P" because Progressives, although they caucus -- and in fact control -- the Democrat Party, are not actually Democrats. Would true Democrats take back there party, it would be a good thing...

The informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by is copyrighted. supports and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The Media © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server