Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Clements denied a Saudi request to have Colorado inmate Homaidan Al-Turki returned to Saudi Arabia to serve out his prison sentence from a 2006 conviction for sexual assaulting a housekeeper, who was described as a "virtual slave."
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Colorado Police Investigate Saudi
Angle in State Official's Murder

InvestigativeProject.org
Refusal to send a convicted sex offender to his native Saudi Arabia to serve out his prison term is among the motives Colorado detectives are investigating in Tuesday's murder of the state's prison director Tom Clements.

The Denver Fox affiliate reported that the Saudi angle "is the primary working theory in the murder" and that others involved in the case, from the state prosecutor to the US attorney, are under police protection.

Clements was killed after answering a knock in his home's front door. A witness reported seeing a vacant car with its engine running

"We're aware of that information. We're sensitive to the fact that there could be any number of people may have had a motive for wanting to target him for a crime such as this," Lt. Jeff Kramer of the El Paso County Sheriff's Office told reporters.

One week earlier, Clements denied a Saudi request to have Colorado inmate Homaidan Al-Turki returned to Saudi Arabia to serve out his prison sentence from a 2006 conviction for sexual assaulting a housekeeper, who was described as a "virtual slave." Al-Turki has refused to undergo sex offender treatment, saying it would violate his Islamic faith.

"Your successful participation in the Sex Offender Treatment and Monitoring Program would reflect positive progression and, although there can be no guarantees of future determinations, could result in your eventual parole or transfer to a Saudi Arabian prison," Clements wrote March 11 in explaining why he denied al-Turki's request.

The decision reportedly angered Saudi officials.

On Tuesday, the Investigative Project on Terrorism reported on a January agreement between the Department of Homeland Security and Saudi Arabia to allow Saudi travelers to apply for the Global Entry program, which allows pre-vetted passengers to avoid long Customs and Border Protection lines at US airports. Critics, including former US Sen. Bob Graham of Florida, said the program appeared to be "a continuation" of an American policy of deference toward Saudi Arabia despite the role Saudi nationals played in the 9/11 attacks.

As Daniel Pipes has chronicled, the Saudis have long taken an interest in al-Turki's case, paying for his bond after his 2005 arrest and trying to intervene in the case. The State Department sent Colorado Attorney General John Suthers to Saudi Arabia to discuss al-Turki's conviction with members of the royal family, including King Abdullah and Crown Prince Sultan.

Clements' murder may turn out to be unrelated. Other reports indicate investigators say the killing did not look like a professional hit. They are looking into his telephone records and pursuing other theories.

But the dispatching of a state attorney general to quell Saudi anger is telling about US-Saudi relations.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 03/21/2013


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server