Front Page
NMJ Search
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House

The nursing homes' costs have soared after negotiating lush contracts with the politically powerful Service Employees International Union Local 1199 NE in 2004.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Union Labor Costs Killing Nursing Homes
Washington Free Beacon
Lucrative union contracts have driven five Connecticut nursing homes at the center of a labor dispute into bankruptcy.

HealthBridge Management has entered five of its nursing homes into Chapter 11 bankruptcy to escape labor contracts that left the company losing $1.3 million each month, according to senior vice president of labor relations Lisa Crutchfield.

"The centers have a bright future if they can operate under labor agreements that reflect today's financial realities, but the fact is the centers will not survive unless we have relief from the crushing burden of unsustainable labor costs, especially the spiraling costs of pension and health care obligations," Crutchfield said in a press release.

The nursing homes' costs have soared after negotiating lush contracts with the politically powerful Service Employees International Union Local 1199 NE in 2004, according to the company. The company spent nearly 50 percent more on employee benefits than the average Connecticut nursing home.

"There is no getting around the fact that SEIU District 1199 labor agreements are the leading reason for nursing home closures in Connecticut. That's bad for patients, employees, physicians and the communities they serve," Ms. Crutchfield said. "In our case, the union's collective bargaining agreements hobble the centers with labor costs that are well above state averages and which are simply unsustainable."

The nursing homes are asking a New Jersey bankruptcy court to amend the contracts since the union has not accepted concessions on pay and benefits...

HealthBridge was left with few options after the embattled National Labor Relations Board ordered the company to rehire 600 striking union members despite allegations that the workers endangered patients during a July walkout. The Connecticut State Police are investigating whether union members mixed up patient medical records and identification documents during the strike.

Lorraine Mulligan, a veteran nurse, pleaded with the NLRB to keep the accused union members away from patients.

"The nature and severity of the … incidents … put the safety, health, and well-being of the residents of those facilities in immediate jeopardy," she said in a legal brief filed by HealthBridge. "A court order requiring the reinstatement of any of them or additionally those who had knowledge of sabotage and failed to act would expose the residents to immediate danger and put them at risk of suffering serious harm or death."

HealthBridge and CareOne, another nursing home company, are suing the union on charges of racketeering and extortion in connection to the walkout and other instances of alleged vandalism. The bankruptcy declaration will put that suit on hold for the time being, according to a source familiar with the case.

The company claims it is just the latest victim of financial giveaways to the union. SEIU 1199 represents 19,000 workers in Connecticut and has contracts in place at nearly 30 percent of state nursing homes. Nearly 70 percent of state nursing home bankruptcies have emerged in centers with SEIU contracts in place, according to HealthBridge.


Editor's Note: So, between Obamacare discontinuing up to 60% of its coverage for seniors on medicine related to diabetes and cardiac maladies, and labor unions running nursing homes out of business, it seems the Progressive Left really doesn't give a rat's ass about Seniors, do they?...We mean, their words sound good, but their actions are killing Seniors...So, if you are a Senior and you voted for Obama, don't you feel like a moron now??...

The informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by is copyrighted. supports and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The Media © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server