Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Archive Email Author

About AJ DiCintio
AJ DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Politics Isn’t Neurosurgery…and That’s the Problem
AJ DiCintio
February 22, 2013
After the remarkably talented and accomplished Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast, the WSJ permitted itself a bit of political giddiness by shouting, "Ben Carson for President."

And why not that indulgence, for Carson's refreshing comments regarding healthcare and taxes invite further innovative ideas based upon the traditional American ethos that agrees with his depiction of freedom as "an elusive bird, constantly on the move, progressively distancing itself from complacency."

The problem for Dr. Carson and other like-minded citizens, however, is that the kind of creative, fact-and-principle-based thinking that drives change in professions from architecture to neurosurgery to zoology is anathema to politicians.

For evidence with respect to Democrats, we need only look beyond the illusory ideas for change the president obsessively mixes up by dumping buckets of glittering generalities into vats brimming with political expediency to discover that the real Barack Obama is a true-believing ideologue devoted to the failed, decrepit concept that since "the nanny state is the good state," any policy that increases the size, scope, and power of the central government is good policy.

Although the worlds of academia, entertainment, and the elite media labor incessantly to convince us otherwise, that worship of leftist dogma produces not the triumph of reason but an irrationality so profound it keeps the liberal mind tightly shut against any historical fact or contemporary reality that threatens its real religion.

For instance, not once has President Obama soberly addressed the public about the major lesson to be learned from the horrendous problems afflicting Europe's largest "social democracies," specifically, that those nations -- in Margaret Thatcher's intellectually honest Plain English -- have "run out of other people's money."

Instead, he continues headlong in his belief that our country will achieve real, lasting prosperity if it adheres to the same arrogantly rapacious, myriad-tentacled ideology that has strangled the life out of Europe's spirit while dooming its youth to the hell where every lost generation dwells.

Of course, this is the same Obama who, in one of the most irresponsible and insulting acts ever committed by an American president, summarily dismissed the debt commission he himself appointed.

The same Obama who thinks it no big deal that for four years running, the Democratally controlled Senate has failed to pass not just one of his budgets but any budget.

And the same Obama who not only lied a trillion dollar lie about the cost of his "Affordable" Care Act but also passed the plan off as an honest, innovative transformation of the healthcare industry when the truth defines it as a reform-ignoring, government expanding monstrosity based upon the failed Great Society welfare model.

Mention of healthcare reminds us that Establishment Republicans are as devoid of truthful, creative thinking as their opponents; for in totally neglecting the problems afflicting an industry that today consumes 17% of GDP and will consume a mad 20% in just another eight years, a truly sick Republican complacency played a major role in creating the environment that allowed "Obamacare" not just to pass but survive the Election of 2012.

With respect to economic policy, that Establishment has again been as stagnant, corrupt, and oblivious to reality as Democrats.

For proof, consider that however unfair, inaccurate, and ironic his claims about saving GM and Chrysler, Obama was able to win the votes of millions of swing state independents and "Reagan Democrats" and thus the election.

Not, mind you, because those voters were uninformed but precisely the opposite.

For instance, they knew all too well that the $80 billion auto bailout was dwarfed by its $600 billion TARP counterpart, which permitted shockingly irresponsible banks, even foreign banks, to have their gambling debts paid off at 100 cents on the dollar.

They also knew that TARP's $600 billion is itself dwarfed by the Fed's Zero Interest Rate Policy, a three trillion dollar contrivance concocted exclusively to:

1) directly replenish the vaults of irresponsible big banks;

2) increase the price of big bank shares, thus explaining why financial shares were the biggest stock market winners in 2012;

3) send equities and commodities markets roaring, thereby creating more financial opportunities for big bank "trading" departments.

Finally, they knew and still know that having rubber-stamped TARP, Establishment Republicans have opposed common sense reforms of the banking industry, reforms that have the support not just of ordinary Main Street conservatives but distinguished conservatives of the financial industry such as former Kansas City Fed Chairman Thomas Hoenig.

Like those of their Democrat counterparts, the minds of Establishment Republicans are closed and corrupt on other crucially important issues, an example of which is revealed by the following rhetorical question:

Is it possible to name an Establishment Republican who is famous for arguing that so-called "free" trade, outsourcing of manufacturing jobs, and importing of cheap goods ultimately benefit the American people and equally famous for conducting a serious discussion with the public about the fact (see Federal Reserve System data) that since 1970, wages as a percent of GDP have been in a relentless decline?

Sadly, with respect to both major parties, there are many more examples to be advanced in support of the notion that there is something rotten in the state of current political thinking.

Whether that "sadly" is replaced by "tragically" will, given the fundamental nature of democracy, depend upon whether We the People demand that, adhering to the principles bequeathed to us by the Founders, our politicians bring much more of Dr. Carson's neurosurgical attitude to their practice of politics.








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server