Front Page
NMJ Search
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House

At some point during the 2012 campaign Pres. Obama dispensed with pleasant-sounding moderate, if insincere riffs, and replaced them with the most ambitious Progressive vision we have seen in nearly a century.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Obama Takes a Liberal Turn
There was a time when President Obama felt the need to hide behind Ronald Reagan's view of the proper role of government. "I've never believed," he said repeatedly on the campaign trail in 2010, "that government has all the answers to our problems." Nor is it the government's role "to create jobs or prosperity." Rather, it is "the drive and ingenuity of our entrepreneurs" and "the skill and dedication of our workers" that comprise "the main engine" of job creation in America.

Those days are long gone. At some point during the 2012 campaign Obama dispensed with these pleasant-sounding, if insincere riffs, and replaced them with the most ambitious Progressive vision we have seen in nearly a century. At its core is an unbounded faith in the wisdom of government to do all things and -- by picking winners and penalizing losers -- to guide us unfailingly through the challenges of life.

This hubristic confidence in government dominated both his second Inaugural Address and last night's State of the Union speech. When it comes to creating jobs and prosperity, the president explained, Uncle Sam is the indispensable partner to America's entrepreneurs. Even as he decried special-interest loopholes in the tax code that benefit the rich, the president devoted much of his speech to unveiling a list of entirely new special interest provisions that would further his Progressive vision.

A partial list of these new government-knows-best initiatives includes:

▪ 15 new "manufacturing innovation institutes" that will create "global centers of high-tech jobs" and lead to the next revolution in manufacturing.

▪ Funneling royalties from oil and gas drilling to a new government "Energy Security Trust" that will discover the next generation of technology to power cars and trucks with something other than fossil fuels.

▪ New government efforts to discover ways to make buildings more energy efficient.

▪ A Fix-It First initiative to identify the very best 70,000 infrastructure projects that deserve to receive federal funding immediately (note: the president resisted the urge to use the disgraced term "shovel-ready projects").

▪ An offer that financial institutions simply can't refuse: Uncle Sam will help them determine which aspiring home owners are "responsible" enough to receive loans.

▪ Government experts will design "high-quality" pre-school programs for every child in America, even though a government study recently determined that the heralded Head Start program is failing the 900,000 low-income children it purports to help each year.

▪ Despite the thriving new market in online and low-cost college options, the government will now issue a scorecard to help parent and students evaluate which colleges offer the best education for the money.

▪ New government rules to determine what employers must pay their female workers, and a new, $9 per-hour minimum wage (up from the current level of $7.25) that will lift the working poor out of poverty even as the new health law adds thousands to the cost of hiring these same entry-level workers.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio's Republican response painted the polar opposite vision. The "opportunity to make it to the middle class or beyond no matter where you start out in life," he said, "isn't bestowed on us from Washington." Rather, "our free-enterprise economy is the source of our middle-class prosperity." The government is similarly lacking in solving difficult social problems, which, Rubio argues, stem from "the moral breakdown in our society." The answer to these challenges, he concluded, "lie primarily in our families and our faiths, not our politicians."


The informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by is copyrighted. supports and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The Media © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server