Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






"If you're going to have a conspiracy theory, at least try to make it pass the laugh test...and this one doesn't even do that," AFP President Tim Phillips said.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Taxpayer Dollars Used for Study
Falsely Smearing TEA Party

FOX News
Taxpayer dollars were used to fund a study that painted the TEA Party movement as the spawn of the tobacco lobby -- a premise that TEA Party leaders say is absurd.

The study was published earlier this month in the Tobacco Control journal and was formally presented by its authors at an on-campus symposium in San Francisco Feb. 8.

"The Tea (sic) Party that we see in 2009 actually has decades of influence from tobacco and other corporate interests," co-author Amanda Fallin said at the time, downplaying the notion that the group is just a "spontaneous grassroots movement."

The charge that the TEA Party is a tool of broader corporate interests is one often leveled by Democrat critics. House Democrat Leader Nancy Pelosi was fond of calling the movement "astroturf" in the run-up to the 2010 mid-term elections where TEA Partiers helped Republicans take control of the House.

The research at the University of California-San Francisco echoes the claim, while weaving in an attractive narrative for TEA Party critics -- that the TEA Party is continuing the agenda of the tobacco industry.

TEA Party leaders, though, roundly rejected the findings. They argued that the groups the study focused on do not compose the entirety of the movement, and that the tobacco issue is a relatively minor aspect of the present-day small-government agenda.

And they complained that a study that arguably targeted administration critics was funded by taxpayers.

"It's an example of the frivolous spending inside the government...that has landed us $17 trillion in debt," said TEA Party Patriots co-founder Jenny Beth Martin.

The study was funded by federal taxpayer grants through the National Institutes of Health and its subsidiary the National Cancer Institute, both federal agencies. It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study, but federal records show researchers at the university have received $7 million since 2007 to study tobacco issues.

The study argues that while conventional wisdom says the TEA Party launched in the spring of 2009, its "roots" lie in the tobacco industry efforts of the 1990s. The premise is that the group Citizens for a Sound Economy, a tobacco industry ally which opposed tobacco taxes and control in the '90s, split a decade later into the conservative groups Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, which have since linked up with part of the TEA Party movement. The study argues that their tactics and beliefs have remained constant by opposing new taxes and regulations.

"As of 2012, AFP and FreedomWorks were supporting the tobacco companies' political agenda by mobilising local TEA Party opposition to tobacco taxes and smoke-free laws," the study said. "This support for the tobacco companies' agenda continues the tobacco industry use of AFP and FreedomWorks' predecessor organisation, Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE), as a third-party ally since at least 1991...Many people in the smokers' rights effort or the tobacco companies went on to TEA Party organizations."

The study argues that both AFP and FreedomWorks were using "tea (sic) party rhetoric" before 2009.

It is true that AFP and FreedomWorks derived from Citizens for a Sound Economy, and that both those groups have in turn been heavily involved in supporting the TEA Party.

However, opposing tobacco taxes is a relatively small part of their current agenda. And those two groups do not compose the entirety of the TEA Party movement. They work with a range of local and national TEA Party groups, but those groups -- including the national TEA Party Patriots -- have their own management.

Martin acknowledged that AFP and FreedomWorks have helped her group and others, but said the movement did not start with them. She found it curious that the study left out TEA Party Patriots.

"If you're going to have a conspiracy theory, at least try to make it pass the laugh test...and this one doesn't even do that," AFP President Tim Phillips told FoxNews.com.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 02/15/2013

Editor's Note: Classic Alinsky tactic...pick the target...isolate it...diminish it...








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server