Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Napolitano began testimony Wednesday by suggesting Republicans and others are looking for ways to block comprehensive reform.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Napolitano Parrots Administration
Narrative in Immigration Hearing

AP/FOX News
Lawmakers clashed Wednesday over border security and enforcement at the first Senate hearing held as part of a renewed push for immigration reform, with Republicans challenging Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano's claim that their concerns are just an "excuse" for inaction.

On the heels of President Obama's State of the Union address in which he called for immigration legislation, Republicans senators sounded skeptical about recent administration reports stating US borders are secure.

"I do not believe the border is secure and I still believe we have a long, long way to go," Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn said during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

His remarks were followed by testimony from Chris Crane, president of the union representing Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, who said agency morale is at a record low because agents are limited in arresting people for illegally entering and living in the United States.

"Each year, ICE leadership finds new excuses to justify the low morale," he said. "Most Americans would be surprised to know that immigration agents are regularly prohibited from enforcing the two most fundamental sections of United States immigration law."

Napolitano began testimony Wednesday by suggesting Republicans and others are looking for ways to block comprehensive reform.

"Too often the border security refrain simply serves as an excuse," she said. "Our borders have in fact never been stronger."

But a top committee Republican, Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, contradicted Napolitano, saying the administration has not focused sufficiently on enforcement.

He also suggested the White House plan calls for amnesty for illegal immigrants over enforcing immigration laws. Sessions called for ICE Director John Morton to resign.

The debate continues to focus largely on border security with Senate Republicans saying reform legislation must begin with stopping the influx of illegal immigrants. Obama says he wants to stress border security in any plan but doesn't want that issue to hold up the path to citizenship for the millions of illegal immigrants already here.

The president plan, announced after winning roughly 71 percent of the Hispanic vote in November, calls for border security, employer enforcement, improvements to legal immigration and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already in the country.

Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of eight senators has been trying to draft a comprehensive bill before next month that also includes eventual citizenship, visa and employer enforcement, and enough border security and enforcement measures to garner conservative support.

Republicans' shift toward potential citizenship matches the overall trend reflected in polls that show more Americans supporting eventual citizenship and a post-election realization their party must reach out more to Hispanics.

Napolitano cited several statistics to prove border security has improved over roughly the past 40 years, including federal immigration agents removing 400,000 people last year compared with 25,000 in 1980.

"The numbers are flying all over the place," she said. "But what I (also) know is fewer people are trying to enter."

She also acknowledged that "more work needs to be done."

Napolitano argued at several points during the hours-long hearing that internal enforcement of immigration laws, including those on businesses, is equally important because the demand for labor is driving illegal border crossings.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 02/13/2013

Editor's Note: It is a sad state of affairs when those appointed to lead consistently refuse to accept the boots-on-the-ground observations of those they are charged to lead...Time after time we are told by border agents and their representatives that directives from Napolitano's office prohibit them from doing their job of securing the border and all Napolitano has to offer in response are numbers that any thinking person would find suspect, given the Obama Administration's penchant for playing fast and loose with statistics in an effort to advance their political agenda...Pay no attention to reality on the ground as reported by your agents, right Ms. Napolitano? It's all about your precious statistics...








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server