Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Confirmation of the test throws down a stark security and diplomatic challenge to Pres. Obama at the start of his second term, and to regional neighbors China, Japan and South Korea, all of which have new or incoming leaders.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
UN Security Council Meets
Over No. Korean Nuclear Test

The London Telegraph
North Korea has confirmed that it has carried out its third nuclear test, after international monitors detected seismic activity close to the nation's nuclear test site.

The North Korean regime said it had "successfully" detonated a miniaturized nuclear device with "greater explosive force" in an underground test. "A third nuclear test has been successfully staged," the state-run Korean Central News agency said.

"The nuclear test was conducted as part of measures to protect our national security and sovereignty against the reckless hostility of the United States that violated our republic's right for a peaceful satellite launch," KCNA said.

The confirmation came after monitors in Seoul, Japan and the US detected an "artificial quake" at 11:57am Korean time. The South Korean Yonhap news agency said it measured 5.1 in magnitude and was located in Kilju county, where the Punggye-ri test site is located. The US Geological Survey measured it as a 4.9-magnitude quake at a very shallow depth of just 0.6 miles.

South Korea raised its military alert level after reports of a quake and the presidential office said that it was "likely" to be a nuclear test, according to Yonhap. Shortly later, a UN Security Council diplomat confirmed it was a nuclear test.

"We've been informed by the South Koreans that there's been a (North Korean) nuclear test," a UN Security Council diplomat told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

North Korea is not prone to seismic activity. It conducted nuclear tests in 2006 and 2009.

The reclusive and isolated state is banned under United Nations Security Council resolutions from developing nuclear and missile technology.

Confirmation of the test throws down a stark security and diplomatic challenge to US President Barack Obama at the start of his second term, and to regional neighbors China, Japan and South Korea, all of which have new or incoming leaders.

The UN Security Council has convened an emergency meeting to discuss the test later today. The first priority for the international community will be determining the precise nature and yield of any test and what it reveals about the technical level of the North's nuclear weapons program.

The United States and its allies have been on edge since North Korea said last month it will conduct its third nuclear test to protest against toughened sanctions over a December rocket launch that the UN called a cover for a banned missile test.

North Korea's powerful National Defense Commission said on January 23 that the United States was its prime target for a nuclear test and long-range rocket launches. North Korea accuses Washington of leading the push to punish Pyongyang for its December rocket launch.

Last October, a spokesman from the commission told state media that the country had built a missile capable of striking the United States, but did not provide further details. A missile featured in an April 2012 military parade appeared to be an intercontinental ballistic missile, but its authenticity has not been verified by foreign experts.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 02/12/2013


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server