Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




In the latest example of cutbacks in the face of more drastic cuts starting next month, the Navy announced that for the first time in two years it cannot afford to have more than one aircraft carrier in the Gulf.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Adversaries Ramp Up Military
Spending as Pentagon Cuts Back

FOX News
As the United States and many of its allies decrease defense spending, America's adversaries are doing the opposite.

It's still unclear whether Washington will miss a March 1 deadline for avoiding sweeping automatic military cuts. But regardless, Russia is set to surpass US defense spending -- when looked at as a percentage of GDP -- in just two years. By the same measure, China is slated to surpass the US in 2035.

Even so, the United States still towers over other countries in GDP. The US GDP was $15 quadrillion in 2011, according to the World Bank, compared to Russia's $1.9 quadrillion and China's $7.3 quadrillion.

"You've seen double-digit increases in Chinese defense spending for more than 15 years now," said Jim Thomas, with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. "And that really should not only give pause to the United States, but it really should be a source of concern for the countries in the region as well."

In the latest example of cutbacks in the face of more drastic cuts starting next month, the USS Truman -- which was slated to deploy Friday to the Persian Gulf -- had its deployment canceled this week. The Navy announced that for the first time in two years it cannot afford to have more than one aircraft carrier in the Gulf.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned it will get worse if Congress doesn't find a solution before March 1.

"Instead of being a first-rate power in the world, we'd turn into a second-rate power. That would be the result of sequester," Panetta said. Sequester is the name for the automatic cuts first passed into law in the summer of 2011 as part of the debt-ceiling deal.

The president's top military adviser concurred.

"You won't find this chairman arguing that we need to do more with less. You'll find me arguing that if that happens we need to do less with less," Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Thursday.

In the Middle East, the Gulf states are increasing their defense spending to counter Iran. As for Iran itself, Thomas said it's difficult to tell how much the country is spending on defense.

"These guys have been going gangbusters rolling out prototypes of advanced weapons systems, whether it is new missiles, new aircraft, new drone aircraft," he said, adding it's tough to tell how authentic those systems are.

But others argue that even with the automatic cuts, the US defense budget will still dwarf that of its adversaries and allies -- when considered as a raw amount, as opposed to a percentage of the country's economy...

Thomas, though, said those figures are "misleading" because the United States deals with defending allies and interests in multiple theaters. "This is not a defense problem that, frankly, any other country in the world has," he said.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 02/09/2013


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server