Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




"I cannot imagine that people would stand by and deliberately hurt this country in terms of our national defense by letting this take place," out-going Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said during testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Benghazi.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Panetta: Cannot Imagine People
Would Deliberately Hurt Country

FOX News
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta used a hearing Thursday on Benghazi to sound a dire warning about looming military cuts, saying the cuts now three weeks away represent "one of the greatest security risks we are now facing."

The outgoing Defense secretary made his latest high-profile effort to plead with Congress to avert the cuts during what may be his final testimony on Capitol Hill. Panetta was testifying on the Libya terror attack before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

At the end of his opening statement, he directly appealed to lawmakers to do "whatever you can" to avoid another threat to the nation's security -- the budget squeeze.

"This budget uncertainty could prompt the most significant ... military readiness crisis in more than a decade," Panetta said.

The warning comes a day after the Pentagon announced it would shrink its aircraft carrier presence in the Persian Gulf from two to one due to looming budget constraints. The department, though, is making a range of other prospective cutbacks -- from civilian furloughs to hiring freezes to smaller military pay increases. Some of those measures are reversible, Panetta said, but time is running out.

The preparations are in advance of a March 1 deadline for sweeping automatic budget cuts. They were originally set to kick in at the beginning of the year, but lawmakers delayed them for two months as part of the fiscal-crisis deal.

So far, Congress has not passed any plan to delay or replace the cuts set to kick in March 1. The Pentagon is looking at more than $42 billion in budget cuts between March and September alone.

Panetta said Thursday that he wants lawmakers to get a "big deal" done soon.

"Stop this constant uncertainty, this month-to-month situation where we don't know what the hell we're going to get," he said.

In the absence of that, Panetta said he would support "whatever package" can stop the cuts. "I cannot imagine that people would stand by and deliberately hurt this country in terms of our national defense by letting this take place."

President Obama has called for Congress to pass a short-term plan to buy time. Republican lawmakers have largely rejected this approach, accusing the president of "kicking the can" and trying to win more tax hikes in the process.

Fox News has learned that Senate Democrats, though, hope to assemble such a plan to delay the cuts for three months and replace them with a variety of other reductions and revenue increases.

A senior Senate source familiar with the plan told Fox News they hope to have the plan ready sometime next week, with the hope they can vote on it the week of Feb. 25.

Under this tentative plan, the sequester would be delayed until June 1 in an effort to get through the congressional budget season.

The House and Senate both aim to complete budgets in March or April.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 02/07/2013

Editor's Note: Really, Sec. Panetta? Then you haven't been paying attention when you converse with the elected Progressives in Washington, DC...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server