Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Labor unions leaders, worried about the increased healthcare costs associated with Obamacare, want lower-paid workers to have access to taxpayer-funded federal subsidies.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Obama Urged Not to Cave to Union
'Demands' to Expand Obamacare

FOX News
Thirty-one Republican senators are urging the White House to reject union "demands" that Obamacare subsidies be extended to some workers that already have coverage through their jobs, saying this is blatantly prohibited under the law.

The senators fired off a letter to President Obama Thursday following a newspaper report that unions -- worried that the law's other requirements would drive up the price of healthcare plans -- want lower-paid workers to have access to federal subsidies.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the Obama administration dismissed the idea early on of giving aid to workers in union-sponsored policies. But a Treasury official, in the same article, said the issue is "the subject of pending regulations."

This raised a red flag for senators. "We respectfully, but strongly, disagree," the senators wrote. "The statement made by Treasury simply ignores the letter of the law."

A number of provisions in the healthcare law threaten to raise the cost of coverage, including the elimination of caps on benefits. The unions, echoing statements by employers across the country, voiced concern that the increase in up-front coverage costs could lead unionized employers to drop health coverage.

But the senators said workers with an employer-based plan simply cannot, under the law, receive subsidies intended for those who don't get insurance through their jobs.

"The Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is not ambiguous, in fact it is explicit, on this point," the lawmakers wrote. "Any consideration of expanding access to subsidies therefore is not subject to regulation, but a change in the law."

They cited one Congressional Research Service report that said employer-sponsored coverage would "generally" make an employee "ineligible to receive a premium subsidy."

The subsidies, along with most major provisions of the healthcare law, are set to go into effect next year.

According to the Journal, 20 million people are covered in plans run by unions and employers.

Those signing the letter to Obama included Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), and Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY).

"Concerns about rising premiums are driven by policies in (the healthcare law)," they wrote. "Rather than considering a diversion of subsidies not remotely contemplated in the statute, perhaps the concerns being raised by union plans should be cause to revisit the taxes, fees and other policies that drive premium increases."

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 02/08/2013

Editor's Note: Maybe the lemming rank-and-file of the labor unions should have examined more closely the promises of "something for nothing" foisted on them by an opportunistic and deceptive Progressive leadership...The truth be told, labor union leaders had everything to do with the crafting of this law and stuck it to their own rank-and-file in an effort to advance the elitist and totalitarian ideology of their Progressive Movement...in other words, labor union leaders are not friends to the union rank-and-file...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server