Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Brennan is described as the public face and architect of the targeted-killing program, which has expanded under Obama. Brennan will also be pressed on his statements about the CIA's enhanced interrogation program, which included waterboarding, which he initially defended publicly.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Lawmakers to See Disturbing Drone
Memos ahead of Brennan Hearing

FOX News
The Obama administration plans to give lawmakers sensitive and long-sought documents Thursday morning that provide the legal rationale for drone strikes on Americans, in a bid to tamp down concerns ahead of the confirmation hearing for President Obama's CIA director nominee.

Concerns about the drone program have flared in the run-up to John Brennan's appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee Thursday afternoon. Unlike Chuck Hagel, the Defense secretary nominee who endured withering criticism last week from Republicans, Brennan is facing complaints largely from members of the president's own party.

Lawmakers threatened a "confrontation" earlier this week over nominees if they did not receive classified legal memos on the drones. After one Justice Department document was leaked late Monday, the administration on Wednesday agreed to hand over the rest of the rationale...

It's unclear whether that will assuage lawmakers' concerns, and spare Brennan some heated questioning later in the day. With lawmakers set to receive the memos Thursday morning, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), said she was "pleased" with the decision...

Brennan has been under fire for his support of the controversial drone program. Brennan also faces continued questions about his views on Bush-era interrogation tactics. Republicans, meanwhile, have lingering questions for Brennan on his knowledge of high-profile leaks last year...

Before the administration agreed to release the memos, a bipartisan group of 11 senators on Monday wrote a letter to Obama asking for "any and all legal opinions" that describe the basis for the authority to "deliberately kill American citizens." Several of the authors of the drone letter sit on the committee that will grill Brennan on Thursday...

Brennan is described as the public face and architect of the targeted-killing program, which has expanded under Obama. The ACLU, a traditional supporter of Obama, is one of the program's chief critics.

Under Brennan, the American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, considered a top Al Qaeda operative, became the first American successfully targeted for death under the program. Two weeks later, his 16-year-old son was also killed in a drone strike, in which the teen was described as collateral damage...

Renewed questions come after the Justice Department document surfaced describing the administration's drone-attack authority. The memo says it is legal for the US government to authorize the killing of Americans overseas if they are suspected of being senior Al Qaeda leaders engaged in efforts to kill Americans...

Brennan will also be pressed on his statements about the CIA's enhanced interrogation program -- which included waterboarding. In an interview with CBS News in 2007, Brennan defended the program as one that has produced information that's been "used against the real hardcore terrorists."

Brennan has since apparently taken a position against the program and claimed he raised concerns while at the agency.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 02/07/2013

Editor's Note: So, waterboarding bad...targeted assassination of American citizens -- regardless of the lack adjudicated proof to designate a citizens guilt or innocence -- good. Gotcha. Of course, seeing as how this Administration pees all over the notion of citizenship anyway, I can't see where people would be surprised...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server