Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Dark Mood Descends on Davos
Nina Easton
January 24, 2013
World business and government leaders are gathering here for this year's World Economic Forum meeting -- titled "resilient dynamism." But no one is fooled by the consciously upbeat title. These are sour times, with the global economy moving sideways at best, and flocks of black swans swimming on the horizon – from threats of social unrest to killer bacteria to deadly natural disasters that appear to be growing in frequency and cost.

It's a good the town's Promenade hums with well-lubed parties every night because nerves are frayed, with words like disruption and fragility dominating the conversation and research, making the usual concerns -- like Washington's political wars, government debt, rising tax burdens, even the prospect of a Eurozone breakup --look like mere nuisance costs.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers International Chair Dennis Nally started setting the dark mood Tuesday night with the release of his company's annual survey of 1,330 CEOs in 68 countries showing that only 36% are "very confident" of seeing strong revenue growth in 2013--compared to 40% last year and a (by comparison) positively giddy 48% in post-US recession 2011.

That's not too surprising given an economic environment where the Eurozone is stuck in recession, the US economy is predicted to grow at a paltry 2.2% (keeping American unemployment rates high) and the BRIC countries are facing a slow down, as the report notes. While CEOs aren't as pessimistic as last year – when nearly half of those surveyed feared a global contraction--most expect flat global growth in 2013.

The survey shows companies hunkering down, focusing on building growth in their own markets (especially US companies, where local market expansion is the primary 2013 growth driver), and building customer loyalty. The other strategy: "A shift to resilience" – code for preparing for nasty surprises.

CEOs are hyper-conscious that, as the study notes, there have been more financial crises in the past 30 years -- from today's sovereign debt crisis in Europe to yesterday's US-led recession to the Russia and Asia crises of the '90s -- than the preceding 350 years taken together.

The same holds for natural disasters, which are coming at an increasingly fast and furious rate. Japan's 2011 tsunami tops the cost and destruction list, followed by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the 2008 China earthquake and last year's Hurricane Sandy, which devastated the coasts of New Jersey and New York.

For all the talk about China's economic slowdown producing a drag on the global economy, the CEOs surveyed were far more worried about social unrest in their own countries, the prospect of a US recession, crippling cyber attacks, natural disasters, a Eurozone breakup and health pandemics (in that order).

In the US, CEOs add to that equation their fears of higher taxes and the regulatory uncertainty caused by the 884-page Dodd Frank financial legislation (23 times as long as Glass-Steagall was, the report notes).

The World Economic Forum, in partnership with the Wharton School, Oxford and Zurich Insurance Co., among others, released its own take on global risks, starting with the fallout from severe income inequality.

That report goes on to catalog a set of nerve-wracking fears, including the possibility that hyper-fast, unfiltered Internet communication could set off a firestorm wave of panic--a modern day, and far more destructive, version of the 1948 radio adaption of H.G. Wells novel The War of the Worlds that convinced listeners the US had been invaded by Martians.

And topping that: Killer bacteria, outpacing medicine's ability to produce new generations of antibiotics, could fuel a deadly pandemic.

Against this grim backdrop is some hopeful news: The 2013 Edelman Trust Barometer, a survey of 31,000 respondents in 26 markets around the globe, shows that public trust in government and business is on the rise.

The bad news (and, of course, there must be bad news): Those levels of trust remain depressingly low.

This article was originally published in Fortune Magazine. Refer to original article for related links and important documentation.

Nina Easton is a regular panelist on Fox News Sunday and Special Report, and has appeared on NBC's Meet the Press, CBS's Face the Nation, and PBS's Washington Week in Review and Charlie Rose. Easton is the author of the critically acclaimed "Gang of Five: Leaders at the Center of the Conservative Ascendancy." Prior to joining Fortune, she won a number of national awards as a Los Angeles Times writer, and later served as the Boston Globe's deputy bureau chief in Washington.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server