Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid threatened to change the filibuster rules with 51 votes, rather than 67 votes, if a deal can't be reached.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Reid Threatens ‘Nuclear Option’ on Filibuster
Politico.com
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says Democrats will take the unprecedented step of changing filibuster rules on a party-line vote if Republicans don't agree to a bipartisan deal this week.

Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell met Tuesday on a proposal to pare back the use of the potent stalling tactic, but the Nevada Democrat then publicly threatened to change the filibuster rules with 51 votes, rather than 67 votes, if a deal can't be reached soon, a tactic critics warn could fundamentally transform the Senate away from a body meant to protect minority party rights.

"I hope in the next 24 to 36 hours we can get something that we agree on," Reid told reporters after lunching with Democrat senators. "If not, we will move forward on what I think needs to be done. My caucus will support me on that."

There are 55 members of the Democrat Caucus, and younger senators in particular have pushed for action to water down the power of filibusters, which take 60 votes and days to overcome.

As part of any deal, McConnell wants to ensure he has a guaranteed number of amendments if Reid chooses to speed debate, GOP senators said Tuesday. Senators said Reid and McConnell were also weighing elements of an alternative plan led by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI) and John McCain (R-AZ) that would guarantee Republicans at least two amendments while preventing them from filibustering in a handful of situations.

Reid is proposing a series of more modest changes that he believes would allow him to streamline the legislative process. He wants to eliminate filibusters used to prevent debate on legislation from starting. He also wants to end filibusters to prevent the Senate from entering talks with the House. And he'd like to pare back the use of filibusters on certain presidential nominations, particularly district court judicial nominees.

He's also considering requiring 41 senators to vote to sustain a filibuster, a subtle shift from the current practice that requires 60 votes to break the stalling tactic. The proposed approach would shift the burden on the opposing party and force the opponents to ensure all their votes are present. Several Republican senators were cool on that idea on Tuesday.

Once a filibuster is defeated, the Senate immediately moves into 30 hours of debate, under current rules. Reid is now weighing whether to make senators actually hold the floor and speak for those 30 hours if they refuse to speed the debate.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 01/22/2013

Editor's Note: In Reid's own words, "The Senate majority leader shouldn't break the rules to change the rules..."


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server