Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






If the bill receives the support of 2/3 of the members of both houses of the Texas legislature, Pres. Obama's federal gun control policies would not be recognized in Texas.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Texas Bill Blocks Pres. Obama’s
Executive Actions on Guns

The Daily Caller
Texas Republican legislators introduced a bill in the state House Wednesday to render President Barack Obama's gun control mandates null and void in the state of Texas.

H.B. No. 553, The Second Amendment Protection Act, was introduced by Rep. John Otto and co-sponsored by fellow Republican representatives Jim Pitts and Drew Darby.

The bill finds President Obama's newly introduced gun policies unconstitutional, though established constitutional law indicates that the bill may be more symbolic than practical.

Obama introduced his plan to prevent gun violence at a Wednesday press conference. The plan includes a federal assault weapons ban, a high-capacity magazine ban and 23 executive actions.

Otto's bill would make the executive actions invalid in the state of Texas.

"The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: 'The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,'" according to the bill.

"The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: 'A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,'" the bill reads.

The bill concludes that President Obama's federal gun control policies should not be recognized in the state of Texas.

"That all federal acts, laws, executive orders, agency orders, and rules or regulations of all kinds with the purpose, intent, or effect of confiscating any firearm, banning any firearm, limiting the size of a magazine for any firearm, imposing any limit on the ammunition that may be purchased for any firearm, taxing any firearm or ammunition therefore, or requiring the registration of any firearm or ammunition therefore, infringes upon Texan's right to bear arms in direct violation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Therefore, any such law is not made in pursuance of the Constitution, is not authorized by the Constitution, and thus, is not the supreme law of the land, and consequently, is invalid in this State and shall be further considered null and void and of no effect in this State."

If the bill receives the support of 2/3 of the members of both houses of the Texas legislature, it will take effect immediately.

However, a constitutional provision known as the Supremacy Clause holds that federal laws, whether passed through Congress or made through a properly authorized executive order, "shall be the supreme law of the land."

"A state cannot pass a statute that blocks enforcement of an otherwise enforceable federal law," according to Stanford University law professor Jeffrey Fisher.

Nevertheless, the bill proves that some state lawmakers are willing to fight Obama's gun control policies in what will likely be a contentious start to the president's second term.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 01/16/2013

Editor's Note: In opposition to Dr. Fisher's opinion on this matter, Mr. Obama is introducing an affront to the spirit of the Second Amendment and, therefore, is not privileged to his actions under the Establishment Clause...As the song goes, "God Bless Texas!"








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server