Front Page
NMJ Search
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House

Head Start, which prepares low-income toddlers for kindergarten, has received low marks throughout its history, which dates back to 1965. It spends $8 billion a year.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Sandy Relief Bill Gives $100M
to Failed Head Start Program

The Superstorm Sandy relief bill planned for a vote Tuesday allocates $100 million for the Head Start program, which not only has nothing to do with the storm, but is also a program that doesn't work, according to a Wall Street Journal editorial.

Head Start, which prepares low-income toddlers for kindergarten, has received low marks throughout its history, which dates back to 1965. It spends $8 billion a year.

The first major evaluation of the program came in 1969 from the Westinghouse Learning Corp. and Ohio University. "It found that pre-schoolers who did make cognitive gains did not maintain them in early grades and that Head Start participants performed no better than children from similar backgrounds who had never been in the program," the editorial says.

"Federal evaluations in 1985 and 2005 also found that any positive cognitive impact was transitory."

The most recent study came from the Department of Health and Human Services last month. "Once again, the research showed that cognitive gains didn't last," the editorial states. "By third grade, you can't tell Head Start alumni from their non-Head Start peers."

So why do Congressmen want to keep throwing money at a flawed program? "Like so many programs directed at the poor, Head Start is well-intentioned, and that's enough for self-congratulatory progressives," Journal writers say.

"But misleading low-income parents about the efficacy of a program is cruel and wastes taxpayer dollars."


The informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by is copyrighted. supports and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The Media © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server