Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






As an insurer, the FHA, which is nested under the Department of Housing and Urban Development, is expected to have enough cash on hand to cover the losses from mortgages gone bad. The slow housing market recovery and continued low interest rates have increased the likelihood of a bailout.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
FHA Will Likely Receive Bailout in Next Few Months
The Daily Caller
Experts are warning that a taxpayer bailout of the Federal Housing Administration is imminent.

"FHA is still in denial … but it's a slow-motion train wreck," Edward Pinto, visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and author of studies on the housing industry, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

A report last November revealed that for the first time since the late 1980s, the federal agency that insures home mortgages had a negative economic value, projecting a $16.3 billion loss. The figures raised the possibility of a taxpayer bailout.

Next month, FHA is expected to request appropriations to close the financial gap the agency is currently running.

"I think the chances are very high that that is going to happen in this cycle," Pinto said.

"FHA has got a negative economic value. They've been under pressure for the last four years. They keep saying, 'Don't worry next year; it will get better.' And for the last four years, it hasn't gotten better. It has gotten worse."

As an insurer, the FHA, which is nested under the Department of Housing and Urban Development, is expected to have enough cash on hand to cover the losses from mortgages gone bad. The slow housing market recovery and continued low interest rates have increased the likelihood of a bailout.

An independent audit stated the situation "does not mean FHA has insufficient cash to pay insurance claims, a current operating deficit or will need to immediately draw funds from the Treasury."

But Pinto worries that continued economic problems could take their toll on the agency.

"As my colleague and I always say, 'They are one recession away from a catastrophic loss to the taxpayers'," Pinto added.

The FHA could amend its insurance program to stave off an expensive taxpayer bailout. Unlike the Veterans Administration or private mortgage insurance, the FHA insures 100 percent of housing mortgages, regardless of down payment or credit score. When the mortgage can't be paid back, the FHA is often on the hook for two-thirds of the home's cost.

Currently, one of six loans is delinquent at the FHA. Pinto suggests the FHA could easily lower its insurance payout in defaulted mortgages.

By design, the FHA has 40 percent of its mortgages in the form of subprime loans, which are inherently more susceptible to delinquency and default. In turn, the FHA could require a higher down payment than the required 3.5 percent.

Mark Calabria, director of financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute, said that's the right move.

"For all borrowers, the FHA should immediately require a 5 percent cash down payment. It should come from the borrower and not in the form of a gift from third parties," Calabria writes in Investors Business Daily.

The FHA was part of a larger federal effort to expand home ownership without regard to creditworthiness.

"Washington fiddled while Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac burned tens of billions, ultimately covered by the taxpayer," Calabria said.

"Congress and the White House have largely repeated that behavior, using the FHA to slow the inevitable correction in the housing market. Before the cost of such policies increase any further, Washington can and should take immediate action to minimize the burden on responsible taxpayers."

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 01/11/2013








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server