Front Page
NMJ Search
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House

Obama’s appointees also helped boost union coffers by weakening the 25-year-old Beck Rule, which allows employees to opt out of union dues that are spent on political activities.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Obama’s NLRB Pushes Radical Pro-Union Agenda
Washington Free Beacon
The National Labor Relations Board unleashed a raft of precedent-busting, pro-union decisions soon after President Barack Obama’s reelection in November.

The board’s three Democratic appointees issued rulings that weakened checks on union power, including two high-profile decisions forcing employers to automatically deduct union dues from worker paychecks when contract agreements expire and limiting the ability of employees to exercise their Beck rights.

“The board is an inherently political institution because it is made up of political appointees,” the Center for Union Facts’ managing director J. Justin Wilson said. “They are constantly overruling themselves.”

The board overturned a 50-year precedent in a ruling that required companies to hand over employee wages to unions when collective bargaining agreements expire. Organized labor previously relied on voluntary dues from workers during negotiations. The ruling will enable unions to continue raking in forced dues throughout negotiations with employers.

The board’s three Democrats concluded that dues deductions were akin to automatic health savings account deductions and that relinquishing them could harm the collective bargaining process. Outgoing board member Brian Hayes, the NLRB’s sole Republican, blasted his colleagues in a blistering dissent.

“My colleagues point to no evidence that this approach has impeded collective bargaining or the peaceful resolution of labor disputes but today they abandon it all the same,” he wrote.

David Phippen, a labor attorney with Constangy, Brooks & Smith, said the board engaged in “rhetorical gymnastics” to extend the dues deductions beyond the life of contracts. Dues deductions were previously held in the same manner as no-strike clauses in contracts. Preserving the union’s money supply during negotiations while allowing them to strike puts employers at an inherent disadvantage, according to Phippen.

“[The ruling] takes away one persuasive factor that would encourage a union to come to an agreement without having to exercise other weapons like a strike,” he said. “Historically everyone has incentive to not be wasting time on an agreement and go on working. Stakes were high for both sides; that may not be the case anymore.”

Obama’s appointees also helped boost union coffers by weakening the 25-year-old Beck Rule, which allows employees to opt out of union dues that are spent on political activities. The board held in the Kent Hospital decision that lobbying could be considered an apolitical activity, a standard that would force non-union employees to pay larger dues.

“This is a fundamental shift on how much of pie the union can take out; it looks like a backdoor attempt [to fund the union] to me,” Phippen said.

The decision also dealt a blow to Beck’s transparency standards. Unions will no longer have to provide employees with accounting records that show employees what portion of dues applied to non-political activity under the decision.

“Previous board decisions said the union had to give Beck objectors audited statements of how dues were spent,” Wilson said. “The current board eliminated the necessity of giving that.”

The ruling was the latest blow to voluntary unionism. President Obama in 2009 signed an executive order that reversed a George W. Bush administration policy that employers notify workers of their Beck Rights in workplaces.


Editor's Note: Money-grubbing, greedy ideologues who enlist government to force you to give them your money...You have no right to work unless the union says so...Comrade...

The informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by is copyrighted. supports and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The Media © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server