Front Page
NMJ Search
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House

So how did the special deals make it into the fiscal cliff compromise? "The White House insisted," said Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
'Fiscal Cliff' Deal Has Billions
in Special Interest Tax Breaks

The Chicago Tribune
In the last-minute dealmaking to stop the nation from tumbling over the so-called fiscal cliff, Congress and the White House decided not to spare most people from a hike in Social Security payroll taxes. But they did find room for billions in special tax breaks for rum makers, racetrack owners, railroads -- and Hollywood studios.

Riding along on the compromise bill were dozens of provisions that renewed existing tax breaks. All told, the business tax breaks will cost more than $63 billion next year, according to an analysis by Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation.

The total cost doesn't add up to much compared with the rest of the federal government's $3.5-trillion budget. Supporters of such deals said that by helping businesses, the measures protect jobs.

Watchdog groups, however, said the survival of the subsidies exposed the broken nature of the tax system -- and Congress' inability to tackle it.

"These are basically spending subsidies written into the tax code, and there was just no discussion about them," said Robert Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, which advocates for fiscal responsibility.

So how did the special deals make it into the fiscal cliff compromise?

"The White House insisted," said Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment.

The measures did get examined in detail by the Senate Finance Committee, which approved them by a 19-5 vote in August. The package includes extensions on popular breaks that benefit individuals, including the deduction for state and local taxes.

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), one of the few who voted against the measure in committee, said he fought vigorously against what he called "tax goodies for special groups...I lost every vote," he said...

The rum excise deal has come under particularly harsh criticism in Congress. Under the 100-year-old arrangement, the government collects a tax on rum and returns nearly all of it to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands to support public programs -- distributing $547 million in fiscal year 2009.

In 2008, the Virgin Islands agreed to use that money to finance a new Captain Morgan distillery for the giant British spirits company Diageo. The company moved its operations from Puerto Rico. Now, other rum makers have gotten in on the deal, and critics say the tax, rather than helping average people, has become a subsidy to the industry...

Supporters of the tax breaks rejected the criticism that the provisions were giveaways sneaked into the fiscal cliff package. Senate Democratic aides noted that the package of tax extenders had passed the Finance Committee with overwhelming bipartisan support in August and had always been in consideration for inclusion in a year-end fiscal bill.

Included in the bill is an extension of a tax break for film and television productions that shoot in the United States, allowing them to expense the first $15 million of costs (or $20 million if the production occurs in economically depressed areas). The incentive will cost an estimated $266 million in 2013...

The "NASCAR tax break," which will cost an estimated $46 million this year, allows motor-racing tracks to depreciate assets faster than other businesses.


Editor's Note: This is the spendthrift mind set that will make comprehensive -- and real -- tax reform more difficult than everyone expects. Unless electeds are willing to take a hit from their big money donors and donor constituents, tax reform with be an exercise in irrelevant babble targeting "everyone else's" horrible loopholes and carve-outs...Read a comprehensive list of carve-outs included in the 'fiscal cliff rescue deal' ...

The informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by is copyrighted. supports and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The Media © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server