Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






The president said he won't tolerate a battle over the debt ceiling like the one he waged with House Republicans in the summer of 2011.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Obama: More Revenue
Needed After 'Fiscal Cliff' Deal

The Washington Times
Following the House vote that averted the "fiscal cliff" Tuesday night by raising taxes on the wealthy, President Obama warned lawmakers that he quickly will seek more tax revenue from high earners and corporations and that he won't bargain in an impending battle over raising the nation's borrowing limit.

While Republicans in Congress say the spending cuts that were missing from this week's agreement must feature prominently in the next fiscal deal, Mr. Obama said future bargains must meet his definition of "balance."

"Cutting spending has to go hand in hand with further reforms to our tax code so that the wealthiest corporations and individuals can't take advantage of loopholes and deductions that aren't available to most Americans," Mr. Obama said in a late-night appearance in the White House press briefing room. "We can't simply cut our way to prosperity."

After making his statement, Mr. Obama then departed on Air Force One overnight for Hawaii, where he rejoined his family to complete the vacation that was interrupted by the last-minute fiscal negotiating.

The legislation approved by the House late on New Year's Day combines $330 billion in new spending with $3.6 trillion in extended tax breaks for most Americans, but a tax increase on the wealthiest wage earners. It raises tax rates for individuals earning more than $400,000 per year and families earning more than $450,000.

Taxpayers below those thresholds will keep their income tax cuts, although most taxpayers will see a tax increase this week because of the expiration of a 2 percent payroll tax cut.

House Republicans voted nearly 2-to-1 against the bill, arguing that it includes too much new spending and tax increases without any deficit reduction. The legislation adds about $4 trillion in deficits over the next decade.

Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, who voted for the deal, said spending still needs to be addressed.

"The federal government has a spending problem that has led to a $16 trillion national debt that threatens our country's future," Mr. Boehner said. "The American people re-elected a Republican majority in the House, and we will use it in 2013 to hold the president accountable for the 'balanced' approach he promised, meaning significant spending cuts and reforms to the entitlement programs that are driving our country deeper and deeper into debt."

The bill's approval came less than 48 hours before a new Congress is sworn in on Thursday.

Mr. Obama said the agreement "enshrines...a principle into law that will remain as long as I am president: The deficit needs to be reduced in a way that's balanced."

"Everyone pays their fair share," Mr. Obama said. "Everyone does their part. That's how our economy works best. That's how we grow. We can't keep cutting things like basic research and new technology and still expect to succeed in a 21st-century economy."

The president said he's willing to consider cuts in Medicare as part of the next fiscal deal, which will come to a head within two months as the federal government bumps up against its legal borrowing limit of $16.4 trillion.

The government technically already has hit that limit, but the Treasury Department is taking steps to postpone the day of reckoning until late February or early March.

The president said he won't tolerate a battle over the debt ceiling like the one he waged with House Republicans in the summer of 2011, a feud that damaged the nation's credit rating and spooked financial markets.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 01/02/2013

Editor's Note: One more time, for the constitutionally illiterate...the Executive Branch has no -- repeat, no -- authority to demand anything where revenue is concerned. Additionally, outside of adding amendments, the Senate shouldn't be anywhere near legislation that has to do with the raising of revenue. Should Mr Obama make any -- any -- move on borrowing (read: raising revenue) the Speaker of the House should file a federal lawsuit against the Executive Branch and demand an immediate hearing by the US Supreme Court over the constitutionality of the Executive Branch acting independently on the raising of revenue...The US Constitution is the rule book for our government, meant to limit the powers of government and their three co-equal branches of government. Today, those elected to office -- including Republicans -- are acting like the Constitution is simply a list of suggestions. That is one of the main reasons we are in the financial and ethical trouble our nation is in...








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server