Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Teamsters Local 523 claims that the three-member NLRB panel was not properly constituted and thus may not act. The case is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Teamster Local Challenges Obama
NLRB Recess Appointments

The Washington Examiner
A Teamsters local has challenged the legality of President Obama's recess appointees to the National Labor Relations Board.

The five-member board currently only three appointees – barely enough for a quorum. Two of those were placed by the White House using "recess appointments." Such appointments are only supposed to be used as an emergency measure when Congress is out of session, but Obama has used them to circumvent Congressional approval entirely.

Senate Republicans has questioned the authority of the current NLRB as a consequence. Now, some Teamsters are on the same side:

"The union disputes that the board is properly and sufficiently constituted, as 'recess' appointments (to NLRB) were made when there was no recess," according to a Dec. 12, 2012 affidavit signed by Teamsters Local 523 President Gary Ketchum.

"As far as I know, that was something that was decided to be accurate," Ketchum told TheDC, referring to the improper recess appointments."


What's going on here? Well, this bunch of Teamsters doesn't like a particular ruling and is trying a novel challenge since it questions the complete authority of an otherwise pro-union agency:

Teamsters Local 523 is disputing a 2011 decision by a three-member NLRB panel that it violated the National Labor Relations Act by, in 2005, agreeing to place Oklahoma delivery driver Kirk Rammage at the bottom of his company's seniority list because Rammage did not belong to the union.

Teamsters Local 523 claims that the three-member NLRB panel was not properly constituted and thus may not act. The case is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court.


One problem with the challenge is that it involves a decision from last year. The board's membership has changed since then.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE: 12/30/2012








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server