Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Retired Gen. James Jones, who served as the president's first security adviser, said, "with the Middle East and Iran, we're probably right back where we were, you know, three or four years ago."
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Ex-Obama Adviser: On Mideast, Iran
US Where It Was 4 Years Ago

FOX News
Shortly after President Obama claimed the US has made significant progress in isolating Iran, his former national security adviser suggested the administration is actually back to the drawing board with the entire region.

Retired Gen. James Jones, who served as the president's first security adviser, discussed the changing Middle East in an interview with PBS' Charlie Rose Tuesday night. He talked about coming into office and addressing those actors who historically were "causing us difficulties," and claimed "in some cases we made some progress."

Jones cited as one success the signing of a new arms reduction treaty with the Russians.

"On the other hand," he continued, "with the Middle East and Iran, we're probably right back where we were, you know, three or four years ago."

Jones went on to suggest that the changes in the region have forced the US to change its approach. "So, it is great to be able to come in and try to think strategically, but you're really many times driven by the tactics of the moment. And you find yourself responding to the tactical impulses that face us. And that's very hard to keep that strategic focus," Jones said.

The comments reflect widespread concerns about not just Iran, but the direction of the Arab Spring. While the US ultimately backed anti-Mubarak protesters in Egypt and actively helped rebels overthrow Muammar Qaddafi in Libya, the newly formed Egyptian government has a much stronger Islamist presence and the US Consulate in Libya was attacked last month by terrorists -- in Benghazi, the de facto headquarters of the revolution the US aided. The civil war in Syria between the Assad regime and opposition forces continues to rage on.

The US presidential candidates made scant reference to Libya in the final presidential debate Monday, but did address the Iranian nuclear program.

Obama rejected claims he hasn't been tough enough on Tehran, saying, "we've put in the toughest, most crippling sanctions ever"...

Mitt Romney countered: "We're four years closer to a nuclear Iran."

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE

Editor's Note: Cutting through the BS, the Arab Spring has served to be a power realignment in favor of fundamentalist Islamists and jihadists. Further, anyone arguing that we are in a better position where the Iranian's development of nuclear capabilities is concerned is either intellectually stunted or dishonest.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server