Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




“He did call it an act of terror. It did, as well, take two weeks or so for the whole idea of there being a riot out there about this tape to come out, you’re correct about that,” CNN's Candy Crowley said during the second presidential debate.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Crowley: Romney 'Right' on Libya,
He Just 'Picked Wrong Word'

NewsMax.com
A sharp debate exchange between Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama over Libya ignited a firestorm on political blogs Tuesday night, after moderator Candy Crowley stepped into the fray to seemingly "correct" Romney on a key point.

US ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were murdered in Benghazi, Libya, on the anniversary of 9/11. Romney challenged Obama's assertion that he had labeled it an act of terrorism, rather than blaming a controversial anti-Muslim video, the day after the attacks.

Said Romney: “I think it’s interesting that the president just said … the day after the attack he went to the Rose Garden and said this was an attack of terror… I want to make sure we get that for the record because it took the president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.”

Crowley, a veteran CNN political correspondent and host of Sunday's "State of the Union" news show, then appeared to correct Romney.

“He did in fact sir.”

Obama: “Can you say that a little louder, Candy?”

Crowley: “He did call it an act of terror. It did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea of there being a riot out there about this tape to come out, you’re correct about that.”

Speaking after the debate, Crowley said on CNN that Romney was correct “in the main” that the administration was slow to acknowledge the deadly assault was a coordinated terrorist attack.

Said Crowley: “Right after that I did turn around and say, but you’re totally correct that they spent two weeks telling us this was about a tape and that that there was this riot outside the Benghazi consulate which there wasn’t. So he [Romney] was right in the main. I just think he picked the wrong word.”

Romney said he found it “more troubling” that the president flew off to attend political fund-raisers the day after the deadly attacks, saying the administration’s handling of the crisis “calls into question the president’s entire policy in the Middle East.”

Romney cited the military upheavals in Syria and Iran’s march toward development of nuclear armaments, saying: “This president’s policies throughout the Middle East began with an apology tour, and pursue a strategy of leading from behind, and this strategy is unraveling before our very eyes.”

Obama responded that the suggestion anyone in his administration would play politics on the issue “is offensive”...

Said Crowley after the debate: “It was just the natural thing to come out of me going actually you know he did call that an act of terror. When half the crowd claps for that and the other half claps for but they kept telling us this was caused by a tape.

“In the main, the thrust of what Governor Romney was saying, which is why I went back and said that...but I just think he picked the wrong way to go about talking about it,” she said.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE

Editor's Note: So, basically Mr. Romney is correct, they just don't like the way he said it...can you say jump through the hoop???


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server