Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Archive Email Author

About AJ DiCintio
AJ DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Embrace the Jobs Report, Mitt!
AJ DiCintio
October 12, 2012
In mid-August, a Rasmussen poll found that a landslide majority of likely voters (59%) believed media bias on behalf of Barack Obama's reelection efforts would continue through Election Day.

With September in the books and the first week of October revealing the same old tactics of the same Old Media, it's abundantly clear those honest voters were absolutely correct, especially if we consider how their observations and conclusions apply to how the pretentious lemmings called media liberals are covering up the truth about the election's singularly most important issue: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs.

Since last Friday, for example, their uniform masses have been huffing and puffing hot, noxious air from anchor desks, front and editorial pages, and headlines of major Internet websites (where the AP's liberal agenda reigns supreme) in a shamelessly insulting effort to inflate and then float the fetid propaganda balloon that last week's "positive" jobs report has given Barack Obama a "boost."

So, if not from the slobbering television sets of NBC, CBS, and ABC news, the pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post, or the home pages of ostensibly neutral websites such as Comcast and Yahoo, where can the voting public get honest facts about jobs and middle class income?

One answer is this:

From honest, independent thinking, data-driven people such as the estimable John Mauldin, whose insights are available gratis at MauldinEconomics.com.

Here, then, in Plain English, is a summary of his observations about the jobs report that sent media elites into uncontrollable spasms of diarrhetic gushing.

Like other fair-minded citizens who scratched their heads over the findings by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mauldin was also "surprised" by a drop in unemployment to 7.8% that sent him thinking "Show me the data" and concluding there had to be "something interesting lurking down among the details."

And something more than merely interesting there was, according to the Texan who is an indefatigable financial analyst, writer, speaker, and traveler.

But it wasn't a conspiracy by the BLS; for as Mauldin points out, such an effort would require the complicity of a number of people so large that a parade of whistleblowers would have been blowing their whistles long before the report hit the news.

It's true, agrees Mauldin, that the report does seem to quack like the product of a conspiracy. But in reality, he informs us, its quackness results from something much less dramatic and infinitely more important. Specifically this:

The BLS found the unemployment rate falling in an increasingly feeble economy because it has been directed to use Congressional New Math in conducting its count.

You haven't looked for a job in the past four weeks? The BLS incredibly must remove you from the workforce. Same goes if you've been out of work for 366 days or more.

In fact, during the past four years, the BLS has removed millions of citizens from the workforce, a practice that will one day reduce the number of people looking for work to zip, thereby permitting Washington's politicians to scream a trillion "I told you so's" about the country's 0% unemployment rate.

The fact is, therefore, that if the agency were using the old, common sense math it employed in the eighties and before, it would find the current unemployment rate at least in the 12 percent range.

However, if the agency were directed to use its own real "U-6" number regarding unemployment, which takes into account part-time workers, huge numbers of whom suffer from the economic disease called "underemployment," it wouldn't have announced a fake rate of 7.8% but a truthful one that stands at a shocking 14.7%.

Regarding the realities surrounding that BLS number, note that at both Columbia and Harvard, Barack Obama must have religiously (make that "scrupulously") cut classes in Underemployment 101 and Underemployment 401, respectively.

If nothing else, the theory explains why over the past four years he has remained as quiet as a church mouse (make that "government building mouse") regarding the Underemployment Tragedy that afflicts millions of job seekers across the employment spectrum, including, as Mauldin points out, 50% of college graduates.

But the country's job problem is not just about the number of jobs being produced; it's also about the quality of the jobs.

Here again, often using the Bureau's own charts, Mauldin brings into the light truths the liberal media is happy to keep under a leaden bushel.

For instance, the fact that for the past three years the economy has averaged about 140,000 new jobs per month at salaries between $20,000-40,000 while it lost an average of 40,000 jobs per month that pay "more than $70,000."

The fact that throughout this "recovery" from one-third to half of new jobs created are in what Philippa Dunne of the Liscio Report calls "Our old friend the eat, drink, and get sick sector." (Bars, restaurants, and low pay health care.)

The fact that we have recovered only 48% of the jobs lost in the recession.

The fact that at the current rate of job growth, it will take a minimum of three recession free years just to get back to where we were in total job numbers when Obama took office.

The fact that the percentage of the U.S. working population keeps falling, again telling us that real unemployment is "well over 12%" and that "we're not even close to [the job totals of] 1999."

The fact that during Obama's term, average income is "up only 0.2%...which means workers are losing ground [to inflation]."

And, finally, the incontrovertible fact that to turn the jobs and income problem around, we have to grow the private sector economy "over 3% per year for a decade" if we are to have any chance of affording "the level of government that we want."

Because of the truths about his four year economic record, candidate Barack Obama isn't interested in those facts, preferring, instead, to continually slime his opponent while taking every opportunity to extol the beauty of big, centralized government, even to the ridiculous extent of obsessing about the money-flush performer named Big Bird.

That's why in the face of the slime and the superficiality, Mitt Romney needs to embrace the jobs report in its profound totality and speak about it calmly, thoughtfully, and respectfully at every opportunity.

But not just Mitt, for as the Rasmussen poll mentioned at the outset reveals, 48 percent of likely voters trust friends and family regarding information about the election and just 26 percent the media.

For good reason, there are many school buildings in this country above whose entrance is chiseled, "The truth shall set you free."

Let's act upon that ancient maxim, which applies to every aspect of human life and affairs, by telling the truth about this nation's job problems.








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server