Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




A CNN flash poll of registered voters who watched the debate found 67% thought Romney won to 25% for Obama. A separate CBS poll, 46% Romney to 22% Obama.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Romney Attacks Obama’s ‘Trickle
Down Government’ in First Debate

The Washington Times
Claiming he’s the true champion of a middle class that’s being “crushed” under President Obama, Mitt Romney went straight at the president Wednesday in the first debate of the campaign, saying his four years in office have doubled the deficit and left the economy gasping.

Mr. Obama countered that Mr. Romney is hiding key parts of his plans from voters, but said from what he’s seen, the Republican nominee would take government back to Bush administration policies that led to the 2008 recession.

Mr. Obama said he’s done what he could in his first four years -- rescuing the auto industry and beginning to add jobs -- but quickly shifted, saying he wants to look forward, not backward...

Like challengers before him, Mr. Romney benefitted from being on the same stage as the president in the 90-minute sparring match, broadcast to a national audience, that underscored the deep policy differences between the two men -- probably the biggest divide between presidential candidates in a generation.

Unlike Mr. Obama, who said he wanted to look forward, Mr. Romney repeatedly pointed back to the last four years, laying a devastating litany of failures on Mr. Obama’s doorstep.

“What we’re seeing right now is a trickle-down government approach which has government thinking it can do a better job than people pursuing their dreams. It’s not working,” he said. “And the proof of that is 23 million people out of work. The proof of that is one out of six people in poverty. The proof of that is we’ve gone from 32 million on food stamps to 47 million on food stamps. The proof of that is 50 percent of college graduates this year can’t find work. We know that the path we’re taking is not working. It’s time for a new path.”

The early reviews were far kinder to Mr. Romney than to the president.

“It looked like Romney wanted to be there, and Obama looked like he didn’t want to be there,” James Carville, a Democrat strategist who advised President Clinton, said on CNN.

And a CNN flash poll of registered voters who watched the debate found 67 percent thought Mr. Romney won to 25 percent for Mr. Obama. A separate CBS poll of undecided voters also give Mr. Romney’s performance a decisive edge, 46 percent to 22 percent, with the rest saying it was a tie.

The Republican had the bigger challenge coming in. He trails in the polls, and voters say they don’t know as much about him and find him less likable than Mr. Obama.

With that context, Mr. Romney labored to portray himself as the defender of the middle class, and to overcome the video released last month that showed him telling wealthy donors that 47 percent of Americans are “victims” receiving government benefits.

“I don’t have a $5 trillion tax cut. I don’t have a tax cut of a scale that you’re talking about,” he told the president. “My view is that we ought to provide tax relief to people in the middle class. But I’m not going to reduce the share of taxes paid by high-income people. High-income people are doing just fine in this economy. They’ll do fine whether you’re president or I am.”

The Republican told stories of middle-class Americans he’s met on the campaign trail who are struggling, and he blamed Mr. Obama’s policies for their plight. He even used the word “buried” -- playing off a gaffe of Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who said earlier in the week that the middle class had been “buried” in the past four years.

Mr. Obama never mentioned the “47 percent” video -- an omission that shocked strategists who said the president was missing major opportunities to dent the Republican. Instead, Mr. Obama repeatedly attacked Mr. Romney for refusing to specify what tax breaks he’ll eliminate in order to make the math on his tax plan add up. And Mr. Romney did not offer any new details, instead flatly vowing that he won’t allow the rich to get tax cuts at the expense of the middle class.

Mr. Obama said it was becoming a pattern for the Republican candidate to hide the details of his proposals...But Mr. Romney was brutally clear on some specific budget cuts he’d make -- including axing funding for PBS, telling debate moderator and long-time PBS newsman Jim Lehrer, “I like PBS. I love Big Bird. I actually like you, too. But I’m not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for.”

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE

Editor's Note: Gloat not, for the next debate will feature a very different Barack Obama...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors. Please make a tax deductible donation today.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server