Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Events prior to the attack in Benghazi that took the life of Amb. Christopher Stevens indicated a clear pattern of security threats that could only be interpreted as to justify increased security for US personnel in Benghazi.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Requests for Increased Security
Prior to Benghazi Attack Denied

House Oversight & Government Reform Committee
House Oversight & Government Reform Committee leaders today sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asking why requests for more protection were denied to the US mission in Libya by Washington officials prior to the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack that killed US Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. The denials came after repeated attacks and security threats to US personnel.

“Based on information provided to the Committee by individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya, the attack that claimed the ambassador’s life was the latest in a long line of attacks on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months leading up to September 11, 2012. It was clearly never, as Administration officials once insisted, the result of a popular protest,” the committee’s chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), and subcommittee chairman, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), write.

“In addition, multiple US federal government officials have confirmed to the Committee that, prior to the September 11 attack, the US mission in Libya made repeated requests for increased security in Benghazi. The mission in Libya, however, was denied these resources by officials in Washington.”

The letter outlines 13 security threats over the six months prior to the attack:

▪ April 6, 2012, BENGHAZI: Two Libyans who had been fired from a contractor providing unarmed static security for Consulate Benghazi, threw a small lED over the Consulate fence. There were no casualties or damage and the suspects were arrested but not prosecuted.

▪ April, 2012, BENGHAZI: A gun battle between an unidentified armed group and forces loyal to the Transitional National Council (TNC) occurred about 4km from Consulate Benghazi. The unidentified armed group attacked a Ministry of the Interior building in an attempt to seize a fleet of vehicles that had belonged to the Gaddafi regime. The gun battle included use of antiaircraft guns and RPGs.

▪ April 25, 2012, TRlPOLI: A US Embassy Local Guard Force officer traveling in a diplomatically-plated vehicle was detained and his Embassy-issued radio seized at a militia checkpoint. He was released without further incident.

▪ April 26, 2012, BENGHAZl: While a Foreign Service officer stationed at Consulate Benghazi was attending a trade-related event at the International Medical University, a fistfight escalated to gunfire between security forces for the trade delegation and militia providing security for the University. A US Foreign Service officer was evacuated by members of the 171h of February Martyrs Brigade, a Libyan militia, stationed at Consulate
Benghazi.

▪ April 27, 2012, BENGHAZI: Two South African contractors were kidnapped by armed men while walking through a residential area of Benghazi. After a brief interrogation about their nationality and purpose in Libya, they were released unharmed.

▪ May 1,2012, TRIPOLI: The Deputy Commander of Embassy Tripoli's Local Guard Force was hijacked, beaten and detained by a group of armed youth. He escaped by climbing over a fence and notifying the Embassy by phone. Libyan security forces fought a gun battle with the assailants in order to recover a number of stolen vehicles and release other detainees.

▪ May 22, 2012, BENGHAZI: Two RPG rounds were fired at the Benghazi office of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), approximately I km from Consulate Benghazi. The attack occurred during the early morning hours and there were no casualties. A Facebook posting that claimed responsibility for the attack said: "After we confirmed that the ICRC were giving out the Bible to the refugees of Tuwerga in Benghazi, a group of Mujaheddin attacked the HQ of the ICRC with an RPG and it targeted the meeting room inside the building. We didn't want to hurt the Christians it is just a warning, we also didn't want to hurt any Muslims working there. We recorded it on video and will publish it soon -- so the lCRC must take down their flag with the red cross and close its offices in Libya. We announce that Libya is an Islamic State. We did not attack the Sahara Bank. Finally, now we are preparing a message for the Americans for disturbing the skies over Derna."

▪ June 2012: Ambassador Stevens was in the habit of taking early morning runs around Tripoli along with members of his security detail. According to sources, sometime in June 2012, a posting on a pro-Gaddafi Facebook page trumpeted these runs and directed a threat against Ambassador Stevens along with a stock photo of him. It is reported that, after stopping these morning runs for about a week, the Ambassador resumed them.

▪ June 6, 2012, BENGHAZI: Under cover of darkness, assailants placed an lED on the north gate of Consulate Benghazi, blowing a hole in the security perimeter that was described by one individual as, "big enough for forty men to go through."

▪ June 10,2012, BENGHAZI: On or about June 10,2012, a two-car convoy carrying the British Ambassador to Libya from a conference on reforming Libyan military law was attacked in broad daylight by a militant with an RPG. This attack was an important escalation in the violence against Western targets in Benghazi, as prior attacks had been at night and were often preceded by warnings from the attackers. Photos from the aftermath of the attack are attached.

▪ Late June 2012, BENGHAZI: The ICRC building was attacked again, this time in broad daylight while people were inside. Once the ICRC pulled out, the US Consulate was the last Western flag flying in Benghazi, making it an ideal target for militants.

▪ August 6, 2012, TRIPOLI: Armed assailants attempted to carjack a vehicle bearing diplomatic plates operated by US security personnel.

▪ WEEKS BEFORE September 11,2012, BENGHAZI: The unarmed Libyan guards employed by British contractor Blue Mountain Group were being warned by their family members to quit their jobs guarding Consulate Benghazi because there were rumors in the community of an impending attack.

“Put together, these events indicated a clear pattern of security threats that could only be reasonably interpreted to justify increased security for US personnel and facilities in Benghazi,” the chairmen write.

The Committee indicated it intends to convene a hearing in Washington on Wednesday October 10, 2012, on the security failures that preceded the attack.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE

Editor's Note: No matter which way you try to paint this event, it was a complete failure of not only foreign policy, but diligence as to security for our diplomats overseas. The only thing more egregious than this ineptitude is the fact -- and it can now no longer be denied -- that the Obama Administration at the highest levels tried to cover-up the ineptness of their performance. The only question left for the mainstream media to ignore is this: What did the President know and when did he know it?


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors. Please make a tax deductible donation today.








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server