Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Although Obama has proposed a 10-year budget plan to stave off the automatic cuts to defense and domestic spending scheduled to hit in 2013, the administration has not formally championed the one-year fix pushed by House Democrats.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Obama Fails to Lead on Sequester;
Mum on House Dem's Bill

The Hill
Even as President Obama draws fire from Republicans over looming sequester cuts, the White House has so far refrained from endorsing the Democrats' plan to avoid them.

Although Obama has proposed a 10-year budget plan to stave off the automatic cuts to defense and domestic spending scheduled to hit in 2013, the administration has not formally championed the one-year fix pushed by House Democrats this week as an alternative to the Republicans' proposals.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen, the sponsor of the Democrats' alternative, said Friday that his bill incorporates many of the same ideas contained in Obama's longer-term proposal.

Those include provisions to end oil and gas subsidies, eliminate direct payments to farmers and adopt the so-called Buffett Rule, which is designed to ensure that wealthy Americans don't pay a lower tax rate than those who earn much less.

But the Maryland Democrat conceded that the White House has not signed off on his plan...

Enacted last August as part of the bipartisan deal to raise the debt ceiling, the sequester consists of roughly $1.1 trillion in automatic cuts split between defense and discretionary domestic spending over the next decade...

On Friday, the White House released a report warning that the “indiscriminate” process would cut 9.4 percent of the defense budget, slash domestic programs across-the-board by 8 percent and cut 2 percent from Medicare coffers.

Republican opposition to the Democrats' proposal for a clean debt-ceiling hike led to the inclusion of the sequester. But GOP leaders are blaming Obama for the looming cuts -- and Friday's report gave them new reason to attack.

"This report confirms that the president’s ‘sequester’ is a serious threat to our national security and must be replaced," House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said in a statement. "It is neither credible nor conscionable that our Commander-in-Chief would point to his budget -- which received zero votes in both the House and Senate -- as a legitimate plan to stop these dangerous defense cuts.”

On Thursday, House Republicans passed legislation requiring the White House to outline a plan to avoid the sequester cuts. Under the GOP bill, Obama would have until Oct. 15 to submit those details, though the bill is likely going nowhere in the Senate.

The Democrats’ proposal didn't get nearly so far. It was shot down in the House Rules Committee a day earlier...

The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the Van Hollen bill.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors. Please make a tax deductible donation today.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server