Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Socialized Medicine Is Enough
to Chase Away British Doctors

Investor's Business Daily Editorial
August 31, 2012
Britain is suffering from an exodus of doctors. If America doesn't want physician flight in its future, voters will have to turn President Obama out of office this fall so that repeal of ObamaCare can be possible.

Last week, the Financial Times reported that its own research revealed that the British "National Health Service is suffering a 'brain drain' of doctors as more medics trained at taxpayers' expense choose to pursue their careers overseas."

More than 8,000 doctors have left since 2008, said the Financial Times. And it's not Britain's problem alone. Nearly 10% of Canadian-trained doctors end up in the U.S.

Several factors were mentioned for the losses in Britain. Among them are "improved lifestyle and better weather ... higher pay, shorter hours and superior arrangements for professional study."

Yet it's obvious that Britain's socialized medicine is one of the chief reasons doctors are leaving, if not the top reason. The Financial Times reports that physicians have complained of "extensive 'goodwill hours' and coming in on days off." Younger doctors also "feel abused by the long hours" they put in.

When a government declares that it will provide "free" health care, there is no escaping the fact that such a system will one day be overwhelmed by demand and the providers -- the doctors and other professionals who are extensively and intensively trained -- won't be able to keep up. They will be overworked, underpaid and frustrated with the difficulties in performing the task they feel called to, namely healing the sick.

We don't pretend to understand why, but the National Health Service is a source of pride in Britain. They cherish it as if it were a treasure, and defend it as if were worth protecting and not the rotted system that it is.

Doctors can take only so much, though. Why stay in Britain where the waiting times to see a physician are often fatal, the denial of care sometimes deadly, the facilities often miserable and the pay is base when there is opportunity, and typically more appealing tax rates, in Australia and New Zealand, which are where many of the departing doctors are relocating? Why remain in Britain, captive of a system that is running out of other people's money to operate off of?

Brain drain among British doctors isn't new. The 1964 study "British Doctors at Home and Abroad" found that as soon as the early 1950s, only a few years after NHS was established in 1948, physicians were leaving for countries where they could make more money and take on a "wider field of work."

Radio talk show host, columnist and author Larry Elder wrote earlier this year about a British anesthesiologist who told him that he was "a refugee" and part of the "British 'brain drain' of the late '60s."

"I left the U.K. to get away from the government telling me how to practice, what to charge," the doctor told Elder.

But the problem he thought he had escaped followed him.

"Now we are getting the same thing," he said. "ObamaCare stinks, and the people will regret it. What happened to the docs there will happen here."

The anesthesiologist doesn't claim to be a prophet, as far as we know. But his words are prophetic. While ObamaCare might not drive America's doctors elsewhere -- given that the U.S. is the world's last hope for freedom, opportunity and prosperity, there isn't any place to go -- it will cause deep problems. Rather than leave, today's U.S. physicians will simply retire early or change careers and tomorrow's will choose another profession, one less regulated and more remunerative.

Does that sound like an age of improved health care is coming? No, it doesn't.

This article was originally published at Investors.com.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors. Please make a tax deductible donation today.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server