Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Archive Email Author

About AJ DiCintio
AJ DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Not Your Father’s Labor Day
AJ DiCintio
August 31, 2012
Four years ago Barack Obama promised us a program of hope and change to reverse the economic decline that is ravaging the dreams we have not just for ourselves but our children and grandchildren.

Unfortunately, we are left today only with dashed hopes and memories of lofty rhetoric now turned bitter and, far too often, ugly.

So it is that as another Labor Day approaches, the shining sky that once enveloped picnics, barbecues, and time spent appreciating late summer's vigorous splendor has gone dark and foreboding.

With his usual insightful honesty, John Mauldin (mauldineconomics.com) captures the grim reality as follows:

"There is something missing from this thing we are calling a recovery. For most in the US it does not feel like a recovery, and for good reason: the jobs aren't there."

This piece, of special relevance to the country's youngest workers, presents some disturbing facts about the "thing" the Obama administration is touting as a recovery and offers an opinion about what needs to be done to give this nation a chance of getting back to Labor Days it once knew.

First, to the issue of jobs, which Mauldin illuminates by referring to a graph published by The Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce for the period of recession ('08-'10) and alleged recovery ('10-'12).

To summarize its content...

Workers with a high school diploma or less lost 5.6 million jobs during the recession, a number which now stands at 5.7 million.

Workers with an associate degree or some college education lost 1.75 million jobs, with their total job number down nearly half a million from its high point in May of '08.

Workers with a B.S. or better have gained 2 million jobs in the recovery, putting them about 1.2 million jobs ahead of their high point in May, '08.

Well, at least that third set of data shows that the job market isn't a disaster for everyone. Right?

Wrong...because the Georgetown graph alone "tells only part of the story."

Citing data from the Economic Policy Institute, Mauldin informs us that "between 2007 and 2011, 98.3 percent of the job gains in [the college educated] group went to advanced degree holders."

Indeed, Atlantic magazine got the job picture right when it asserted that "These days, it seems we're really in a grad school economy."

Sadly, millions of college grads and their parents have long been aware of that truth, about which a recent NYT article reveals a number of disheartening statistical facts, including this one:

"In the last year, [college grads] were more likely to be employed as waiters, waitresses, bartenders and food service helpers than as engineers, physicists, chemists, and mathematicians."

However, the nation's appalling job situation and the reality that most workers' wages have been flat for the past decade aren't the only clouds darkening Labor Day.

Also roiling the sky are these ominous problems that no amount of taxing the rich or anyone else will solve:

The federal government's $1.5 trillion annual deficit, its nearly $16 trillion debt (100% of GDP), its trade policies that nation build in China and elsewhere at the expense of American workers, and its insanely ironic open border policy that purports to energize an increasingly technological economy by infusing it annually with hundreds of thousands of utterly untrained, unskilled workers.

Then, there are the hard actuarial facts about entitlement spending, for instance, as Mauldin reports, that as of June this year there are just two Americans in the private workforce for every person receiving Social Security's pension or disability payments.

Yet with the nation confronted by a host of profound economic problems, the current administration has failed to propose a single brave, honest, innovative solution to any of them, especially the healthcare cost problem, which Mauldin perceptively argues, makes Social Security reform look "easy."

Moreover, what the administration has done at every turn is to lay on an already beleaguered population an ever increasing burden of federal spending, the madness of its fiscal behavior best exemplified by the trillion dollar lie it lied when it forced "Obamacare" down the nation's throat.

And "madness" is precisely the right word if we summon up the courage and good sense to look at unemployment rates among the young in Europe's debt-sickened "social democracies."

Yes, 51% in Spain, 36% in Italy, and 23% in "better off" France, Great Britain, and Sweden tell us all we need to know about what really happens when a nation embraces the canard that a combination of big government power, big government spending, and big government debt "spreads the wealth around."

Which brings me back to Labor Day and the fact that this year it's followed by perhaps the most important election in the nation's lifetime.

I'm not going to suggest that a change in administration will immediately have us singing "happy days are here again," for only liars or airheads claim there are easy answers to getting the country back on the right path.

I am suggesting, however, that given his record as a leader who has excelled only at turning a blind eye to vicious epithets spewed at those who oppose his policies, Barack Obama has got to go if we are to have any chance of brightening the sky over Labor Days to come.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors. Please make a tax deductible donation today.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server