Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Senior RNC officials and delegates fear the Ginsberg power grab will dampen the enthusiasm of rank-and-file members, and hamper this year’s bid to unseat President Obama.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
GOP Officials Accuse Romney's
Chief Attorney of ‘Power Grab’

The Washington Times
Top Republicans are fighting one another over what one party leader called “one of the biggest power grabs” in the party’s history.

Senior GOP officials are accusing the Romney campaign’s chief attorney, Ben Ginsberg, of pushing through a rules change for delegate selection that would give Mitt Romney enormous power over the primary process should he win the White House and seek re-election in 2016.

“It shifts the power to select delegates from the state party to the [party’s presidential] candidate,” Republican National Committee Vice Chairman Jim Bopp told The Washington Times on Sunday. “And it would make the Republican Party a top-down, not bottom-up, party.”

Conservatives, as well as some moderates, said Mr. Ginsberg persuaded RNC Rules Committee members to let Mr. Romney -- if he becomes president -- decide which delegates will be seated at the 2016 GOP presidential nominating convention. It also calls for letting future presidential hopefuls decide who gets to take the delegate slots they win in each state.

Even though changes won’t take effect until 2016, senior officials fear that it will dampen the enthusiasm of rank-and-file members, and hamper this year’s bid to unseat President Obama.

Mr. Bopp, who called it “one of the biggest power grabs in the history of the Republican Party,” said the issue emerged because of a fight this year over Ron Paul delegates. He said that has been worked out and minor changes can address similar issues in the future.

“Those of us in states where the Republican Party is thriving have a problem with people from states where the Republican Party is on life support telling us how to run our business,” a ranking Southern delegate said in obvious reference to Boston (where many of Mr. Romney’s closest advisers hang their hats, as well as to Massachusetts and the Northeast in general). “They would be better served by taking lessons.”

“It’s not just conservative RNC members heading home and sharing their new reasons to be skeptical, but every grass-roots conservative leader who catches wind of this and understands it,” former Virginia Republican Party Chairman Jeff Frederick said. “Conservative leaders with their own broad channels to communicate [will have] new evidence that the narrative of doubt on Romney -- whether he will be ‘radically conservative’ (his words at CPAC this year) as he has promised or whether he’ll be more like the Massachusetts Gov. Romney we all remember.”

Romney advisers have argued in private that Mr. Ginsberg instigated the rules change and that the issue has become irrelevant.

Mr. Ginsberg could not be reached for comment. He has served as the behind-the-scenes enforcer of the desires of the GOP establishment for decades.

“This is an abuse of power that we hope will be changed when the full Republican National Convention adopts our minority report that will restore the old rules that let states decide on delegates,” said Carolyn McClarty, chairwoman of the Oklahoma delegation to the national convention.

Opponents of the move said Mr. Ginsberg “blindsided” RNC Chairman Reince Priebus.

Mr. Priebus, considered the most conservative national chairman in recent memory, has been put in a difficult situation. If he sides with the grass-roots proponents on the national committee, he butts heads with his party’s presumptive presidential nominee, which is unprecedented in both parties.

“We can’t let them undo, with one bad change in the rules, the two years of good work Reince has done in opening up this party to the grass roots,” Mrs. McClarty said.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE

Editor's Note: Very bad development...this will put the TEA Party element of the GOP on the opposite side of the issue from Mr. Ginsberg. TEA Partiers want the GOP to return to its roots which is a dedicated organization of bottom-up control (as the country's Founders envisioned our national government to be), not a mirror image of the DNC; a top-down strongman-controlled organization. This cancer has to be carved out immediately. Mr. Ginsberg has to go for the sake of party unity.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors. Please make a tax deductible donation today.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server