Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Awaiting the Obama PAC Ad That Jumps the Shark
Lee Carey
August 11, 2012
Don't be surprised when an Obama superPAC ad threatens urban disorder if Obama loses the election.

Jump the shark "is an idiom created by Jon Hein that is used to describe the moment in the evolution of a television show when it begins a decline in quality that is beyond recovery. The phrase is also used to refer to a particular scene, episode or aspect of a show in which the writers use some type of 'gimmick' in a desperate attempt to keep viewers' interest."

As the elections draws near, Obama superPAC ads will likely become more desperate. "So what's more desperate that accusing Romney of murdering someone's wife?" you ask. Stand by.

How about a superPAC ad -- the superPACs are the pit bulls of the Obama campaign -- that subtly threatens urban disorder if Obama loses the election. It would make the point, while giving the Obama campaign credible denial (We don't control that dog!) of any complicity in crafting the message. We're watching that denial -- incredible, in the current case -- play out with the Obama superPAC ad featuring Romney-as-wife-killer.

Lest "urban disorder" be read as code words, I'll translate: Civil disorder among black youths in and near big city ghettos. Never mind that America's failing large cities have been largely run by incompetent and corrupt Democrat politicians for decades. That wouldn't be mentioned in the ad.

Nor will there be any mention of the rash of flash mobs popping up in convenience and department stores across the nation where they pilfer goods from shelves and racks, then run away. The flash mob phenomena receive local news attention, and national coverage through the DRUDGE REPORT, but not much notice beyond those venues.

So as the prospects for Obama's re-election become dicier over the next two months, how can an Obama superPAC send a message suggesting that Obama must be re-elected in order to keep peace in America's cities? And do it without being too obvious in intent?

How about this approach:

The narrator -- a woman's voice -- begins by reminding viewers that, in '08, America proudly elected an historic Presidential candidate. No elaboration needed.

It transitions to a description of the plight of urban American cities -- like Detroit -- where Romney-like jobs outsourcing has robbed urban dwellers of their opportunities for employment. (The sub-text, communicated via unscripted video, is that rich suburban folks are able to commute to work in their foreign luxury cars. Not so for the urban poor.)

The ad shows idle youth standing on street corners. The narrator asks, "Without hope, what becomes of these young Americans?"

Translation: How will they respond if the man who gave them hope is rejected by the nation? Will this not represent a rejection of them, too?

The ad fades, closing with that lingering question.

By its end, it will have delivered a subtle threat, without blatantly stating the threat.

This article was originally published at AmericanThinker.com.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors. Please make a tax deductible donation today.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server