Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Mr. Obama's decision to put his political well-being ahead of the responsibility of his office means there is little hope of a swift resolution to the Syrian crisis, with the stage set instead for a protracted civil war.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Obama Refuses to Act on Syria Before Election
Sydney Morning Herald
Barack Obama's government has warned its Western allies and Syria's opposition groups that it can do nothing to intervene in the country's crisis until after November's presidential election.

Despite the pleas of Syrian rebels, who are seeking help for their efforts to overthrow the President, Bashar al-Assad, the White House has refused all requests for heavy weapons and intelligence support.

The announcement came as fighting in Damascus reached its worst level since the uprising began last year.

Syrian government forces backed by helicopter gunships battled rebels in fierce clashes overnight, the latest sign that Syria's conflict is fast descending into a civil war that is moving ever closer to the heart of Mr Assad's regime.

Government forces have already used tanks and armored personnel carriers in the fight in the capital but the use of airpower reflected the intensity and seriousness of the clashes.

Syrian lobby groups in Washington, who weeks ago were expressing hope the Obama administration might approve the supply of anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles, said they had now been forced to ''take a reality pill'' by the US government.

It is understood the Syrian Support Group, the political wing of the Free Syrian Army, recently prepared a document requesting 1000 RPG-29 anti-tank missiles, 500 SAM-7 rockets and 750 23mm machine guns, as well as body armour and secure satellite phones. They also wanted $US6 million to pay rebel fighters. But the group abandoned these plans after being warned they would be rejected.

The Obama administration has also made clear to its allies that it will not intervene, a message that was carried to London last week by Tom Donilon, the White House national security adviser.

Sources in Washington who were familiar with the matter said Mr Donilon had made it ''abundantly clear'' there was no room for increased American involvement in Syria.

Syrian lobby groups in Washington have been reluctant to speak publicly about their frustrations with the Obama government for fear of alienating White House officials, but also giving succor to the Assad regime.

However, a third lobby group, which asked to remain anonymous, said it too had come up against a White House ''red line''.

The American position means there is little hope of a swift resolution to the Syrian crisis, with the stage set instead for a protracted civil war.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE

Editor's Note: This cowardly decision also exposes the fact that Mr. Obama and his band of Progressive political opportunists put re-election ahead of human life and the responsibility of the office of the President of the United States to make tough decisions in the face of politics.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...


The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors. Please make a tax deductible donation today.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server