Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




The PRI for 71 years ruled as a single party known for coercion and corruption, but also for building Mexico’s institutions and social services. It often was accused of stealing elections.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Mexico’s Former Ruling Party Voted Back into Office
AP/The Washington Times
The party that ruled Mexico with an iron grip for most of the past century sailed back into power on Sunday as it promised a government that will be modern, responsible and open to criticism.

Though Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) candidate Enrique Pena Nieto’s margin of victory was clear in the preliminary count from Sunday’s election, it was not the mandate the party had anticipated from pre-election polls that had at times shown the youthful, 45-year-old with support of more than half of Mexico’s voters.

Instead, he won 38 percent support, about 7 points more than his nearest rival, according to a representative count of the ballots, and he went to work immediately to win over the two-thirds who didn’t vote for him, many of whom rejected his claim that he represented a reformed and repentant party.

“We’re a new generation. There is no return to the past,” he said in his victory speech. “It’s time to move on from the country we are to the Mexico we deserve and that we can be … where every Mexican writes his own success story.”

But his top challenger, leftist candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, refused to concede, saying he would await a full count and legal review. He won roughly 31 percent of the vote, according to the preliminary count, which has a margin of error of 1 percentage point. Mr. Lopez Obrador in 2006 paralyzed Mexico City streets with hundreds of thousands of supporters when he narrowly lost to President Felipe Calderon.

This time, only about 700 gathered at his campaign rally, and he canceled plans to proceed to the Zocalo, the main square he filled as recently as Wednesday.

“We have information that indicates something different from what they’re saying officially,” he said. “We’re not going to act in an irresponsible manner.”

The PRI for 71 years ruled as a single party known for coercion and corruption, but also for building Mexico’s institutions and social services. It often was accused of stealing elections, most infamously the 1988 presidential vote. But PRI governments also were known for keeping a lid on organized crime, whose battles with government and one another under Mr. Calderon have taken more than 50,000 lives and traumatized the country.

Repeating a popular belief of many Pena Nieto supporters, Martha Trejo, 37, of Tampico said: “He’ll stabilize the cartels. He’ll negotiate so they don’t hurt innocents.”

Mr. Pena Nieto in his victory speech vowed he won’t make pacts with organized crime, but rather will focus on curbing violence.

Many predict he will build on Mr. Calderon’s economic and security strategies but, working with a more friendly Congress, may have more success. The main test of a new PRI will be how it handles corruption.

“We know there is some local corruption in the PRI with organized crime,” said Andrew Selee of the Washington-based Mexico Institute. “The question is, ‘Will they ignore it or go after it aggressively?’”

The vote Sunday went smoothly, with the usual protests at polling places that ran out of ballots and a few arrests for small cases of alleged bribery or tampering of ballots.

Josefina Vazquez Mota of the ruling National Action Party, Mexico’s first female candidate for a major party, conceded almost immediately after the polls closed, and exit surveys showed her trailing in third place. The preliminary count gave her roughly 26 percent.

Her party unseated the PRI after 71 years in 2000 with the victory of Vicente Fox, who won more than 40 percent of vote, and again with Mr. Calderon in 2006, who won by a half percentage point over Mr. Lopez Obrador.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server