Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




“These very same people holding him in contempt are part of a nationwide scheme to suppress the vote. They are closely allied with those who are suffocating the system: unlimited special interest secret money and they are poisoning the debate,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (P-CA), charged.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Video: Pelosi Alleges GOP Voter Suppression Scheme
RollCall.com


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (P-CA) today accused House Republicans of using contempt of Congress proceedings against Attorney General Eric Holder to further a “scheme” to undermine his efforts to prevent voter suppression.

“It’s really important to note how this is connected to some of the other decisions. It is no accident, it is no coincidence, that the Attorney General of the United States, is the person responsible for making sure that voter suppression does not happen in our country, that issues that relate to the civil liberties of the American people are upheld,” Pelosi said at her weekly press availability.

The House Oversight & Government Reform Committee voted along party lines to hold Holder in contempt over what Republicans say is his lack of cooperation in their investigation of the botched gun sting “Fast & Furious.”

“These very same people holding him in contempt are part of a nationwide scheme to suppress the vote. They are closely allied with those who are suffocating the system: unlimited special interest secret money and they are poisoning the debate.”

Pelosi said the intent of the investigation is to harm Holder.

“Contempt of Congress? Contempt of Congress? To frivolously use that really important vehicle to undermine the person who’s assigned to stop the voter suppression in our country. I’m telling you, this is connected. It is no accident. It is a decision, and it is as clear as can be. It’s not only to monopolize his time, it’s to undermine his name,” she said.

Pelosi was pressed on how the current conflict between the House GOP and the Justice Department differed from when the House, then under her leadership as Speaker in 2007, held two White House officials from the George W. Bush administration in contempt of Congress.

Pelosi said there is a “vast difference” between the circumstances of the two instances and deferred detailed questions to Rep. Elijah Cummings (P-MD), ranking member of the Oversight committee, who she said she was “so very, very proud” of for how he had represented Democrats during recent days.

Pelosi unloaded on Republican policies, describing them as holding a radical political philosophy.

“They are the party that makes Adam Smith look like a Keynesian. They are laissez, laissez, laissez, laissez, laissez, laissez, laissez-fair. No supervision. No regulation. No discipline,” Pelosi said.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE

Editor's Note: No discipline unless it comes to wanting entitlement and tax reform and fiscally conservative spending agendas...As for the "voter suppression" allegation...well...we absolutely abhor name-calling unless the term being foisted upon the target is wholly appropriate. In this case we feel confident in saying that Nancy Pelosi is a moron.


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server