Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




The actions by the ruling military council on Friday, acting on a court ruling rushed out on the eve of the vote that dissolved Parliament, foreclosed the possibility that the Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood might immediately take control of both the Parliament and the presidency.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Voting Begins in Egypt’s Presidential Runoff Election
The New York Times
Egyptians lined up Saturday to pick the first president since the ouster of Hosni Mubarak, choosing between a standard-bearer of the old secular autocracy and a veteran of its Islamist opposition, even as a power grab by Egypt’s ruling generals ended the hope that the vote would complete Egypt’s transition to democracy.

The runoff election this weekend was to have been the culmination of a nearly 18-month transition since the 18-day uprising that forced out Mr. Mubarak, the moment that the generals who seized control after his ouster said they were waiting for to hand power to an elected civilian, inaugurate a new democracy, and end six decades of military rule.

Instead, the vote took place in the shadow of the generals’ moves just a day before to shut down the democratically elected, Islamist-led Parliament, take over lawmaking authority and vow to issue their own interim constitution, which would define the role of the leader voters were choosing on Saturday.

“This is the end stage of the whole transition,” said Mahmoud Ismail, 27, a political activist in the town of Menoufia. “To be or not to be.”

The actions by the ruling military council on Friday, acting on a court ruling rushed out on the eve of the vote that dissolved Parliament, foreclosed the possibility that the Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood might immediately take control of both the Parliament and the presidency. And it raised the likelihood that the new president will be either wrestling the military for power in a longer political struggle or perhaps collaborating and doing its bidding.

Many called it a soft coup, and some voters said they had all but abandoned their hopes for the man they would elect. “The president who is coming will have no powers whatsoever,” said Mohamed Saqr, 51, a bank manager waiting to cast his vote in the working class Cairo neighborhood of Saeda Zeinab.

The two candidates, meanwhile, representing the main opposing forces of the Mubarak era, pushed ahead with their campaigns, mobilizing their respective battle-tested political machines.

The Islamist, Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood, waited in line to cast his vote in the Nile Delta town of Zagazig where he used to teach engineering. “God is great,” a throng cried as he emerged. He saluted those killed demonstrating against Mr. Mubarak. “Today is the day of the martyrs,” he declared. “There is no place at all for Mubarak’s helpers.”

The other candidate, Ahmed Shafik, a former Air Force general and Mr. Mubarak’s last prime minister, cast his ballot in the style of his former boss. Surrounded by a heavy guard of military and police officers, he visited a school-turned-polling place in an upscale suburb. The lines were pushed aside and guards immediately closed the facility for his private use.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server