Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamofascism
Government & Politics
National & Local
Progressivism
Culture Wars
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy blocked a lower court ruling forcing the state to accept a federal voter registration form that does not require proof of citizenship from taking effect.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Justice Kennedy: Arizona Voter
Registration Law OK for Now

Arizona Daily Star
Arizona can continue to demand proof of citizenship before registering voters, at least for the time being.

In a brief order Thursday, US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy blocked a lower court ruling forcing the state to accept a federal voter registration form that does not require proof of citizenship from taking effect today.

Instead, he directed those who successfully challenged the citizenship requirement to file legal papers by Monday explaining why the April decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals should be upheld.

It does not mean the high court intends to overturn the ruling, or even from preventing it from taking effect while the state seeks review. But it does mean at least one justice thinks the issue is significant enough to require an immediate look by him and his colleagues.

If nothing else, the order is a temporary setback for efforts by the Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund and the Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona to overrule a provision of a 2004 voter-approved initiative aimed at illegal immigrants.

One portion of the initiative required proof of citizenship to register to vote and showing certain forms of identification before being able to cast a ballot.

In a split decision, the appellate court upheld the voter ID rules. But the judges said the state cannot strictly enforce the proof of citizenship requirement to register.

Judge Sandra Ikuta pointed out Congress mandated creation of a form designed to allow individuals to register to vote by mail. That form does not include a proof-of-citizenship requirement.

What that means, the judge said, is Arizona election officials have to register those people who sign up using the federal form, even if they do not provide the state-mandated identification.

In a petition to the high court, state Solicitor General David Cole urged the justices to immediately intervene. He argued the 9th Circuit ruling is flawed, and if it is allowed to take effect, it will make it difficult for Arizona and other states to ensure only those who are eligible get to cast a vote.

The federal law requires Arizona, and all other states, to accept and use the federal form. But the state, citing the 2004 ballot measure, is refusing to accept those forms without separate proof of citizenship.

Cole, in his arguments to Kennedy, said the federal National Voter Registration Act is designed to enhance the integrity of elections, but allowing people to vote without first proving they are citizens works in the opposite direction.

READ FULL SOURCE ARTICLE

Editor's Note: A very good sign...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...


The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a tax deductible donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2013    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server