February 24, 2012
Last week I wrote about how the record shows that Barack Obama and the rest of the Democratic Party's power structure are incorrigibly devoted to the liberal dogma that preaches the need for ever bigger, more powerful, more costly, more indebted government, closing by saying I'd next offer some thoughts about how the U.S. can avoid the debt-induced devastation that will begin, according to financial expert John Mauldin, in just "a few years." (frontlinethoughts.com)
First, however, this succinct statement from Mauldin about the reason for the ravages certain to occur when America's participation in the world's "Debt Supercycle" comes to an end:
No country can run deficits the size we are currently running, along with unfunded deficits [think Medicare, Social Security, federal pensions] over four times the size of the economy and a growing overall debt burden, without consequences.
As a matter of fact, those consequences will be dire; for the unhappy truth is that when the cost of servicing a $15.4 trillion debt growing annually by $1.3 trillion rises dramatically, as it surely will, Reality will agonize over the economic pain and social upheaval its bites inflict upon America with the same hard, remorseless detachment it is exhibiting over Greece's current misery.
Yet, the Liberal Establishment continues its long history of being shamelessly AWOL in the battle to get spending, deficits, and debt under control, giving rise to the fact that at least for this election, the Republican Party represents the only real hope for getting this nation on a sensible fiscal path.
So, how should a Republican leader who says he agrees with George Washington that fiscal integrity must be among government's highest priorities proceed if he is to have a real chance of achieving responsible fiscal reform?
Well, in harmony with what every great thinker has said or written, he must conform his behavior to Emerson's "triumph of principles," including the principle that teaches there is no transfer, a fundamental truth that can be explained as follows:
If you want people to understand something (actually, anything), you can't simply hope they'll somehow figure it out. You've got to communicate it or teach it unambiguously.
For instance, if you want children to learn about honesty, you can't simply hope they'll somehow "get it" from their experiences, you must engage them in a precise discussion of the whats, whys, and hows associated with the virtue.
With respect, then, to the problem at hand, here's the first explicit statement a Republican leader must make to the American people:
"I accept fully that you are right to have no faith in Washington when it comes to wisely and fairly solving the problem of the nation's deadly addiction to spending and debt."
And here's the second:
"That's why before I turn my attention to putting Social Security and Medicare on a sound long-term footing, I intend to earn your trust by instituting policies that:
1) energize the economy and bring good jobs lost through unfair trade back to America, thereby increasing tax revenues and reducing the deficit
2) cut the deficit by hundreds of billions annually through elimination of waste, duplication, and unnecessary departments wherever they exist in the federal bureaucracy
3) reform the federal tax code in a manner that makes it work for the good of the people, not the good of a special few, with any resulting increased revenues devoted exclusively to reducing debt
4) raise taxes only if every other means of bringing the budget into balance fails."
As the current reality in Greece demonstrates all too vividly, there is no good or easy solution available to a country faced with the problem of reducing its rampaging spending and debt, only a solution that is economically sound, practicable, and least painful.
That is the case regarding the strategy just suggested.
First, because agreeing to it requires the leader to summon the courage to heed the warning implicit in the ancient maxim, "Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall."
In more specific terms, it requires him to reject the lure of Arrogance that urges politicians to pursue foolish, dangerous, pompously titled, grand solutions such as one that purports to create a society so omnipotently "great" it will once and for all win a "War on Poverty" or one that promises to institute a world order so bravely "new" that the millennium pales in comparison.
Indeed, if the leader exhibits that kind of courage, he can cement majority support for the measured, pragmatic approach described above with this comment:
"My fellow Americans, I have chosen this carefully calculated course because history has taught all of us what happens, for example, when pride impels a leader to believe that in just two short months, he and his friends in Congress can effectively legislate an overhaul of the nation's entire healthcare system."
Second, because the strategy requires a leader to behave in accordance with the tenet of rhetoric that requires choosing the specific over the general.
Once again, the leader will gain an advantage from acting on principle, for as the polls reveal, the public is disgusted with the cowardly, meaningless gobbledygook babbled by politicians who sell out their nation with the kind of fiscal fakery Shah Gilani (moneymorning.com) mocks with the phrase "extend and pretend."
Third, because the plan requires leaders and the public to understand that like it or not, this problem must be solved moderately over a period of years.
Steady progress must be the rule; for even if we could cut a trillion dollars from the budget in a single year, we would forbear from doing so the moment we realize such an act would thrust us into the same position in which euro, debt, and austerity bound Greece ironically finds itself, that is, whirling ever downward in a recessionary death spiral.
With mention of the public, there is one final thing to say.
As the current Greek tragedy reveals, neither a leader nor a party alone can fix the problem.
Only a democratic people themselves can create a political climate that prevents a nation from continuing on the path to devastation by debt, a reality that ought to motivate every Republican, conservative, independent, libertarian and moderate Democrat to think about Emerson's closing lines to "Self-Reliance" as also saying this:
"Nothing can save our nation but ourselves. Nothing can save our nation but the triumph of principles."
The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...
The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.