Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Archive Email Author

About Nancy Salvato
Nancy Salvato is the Director of Education and the Constitutional Literacy Program for Basics Project, a non-profit, non-partisan research and educational project whose mission is to re-introduce the American public to the basic elements of our constitutional heritage while providing non-partisan, fact-based information on relevant socio-political issues important to our country. She is a graduate of the National Endowment for the Humanities’ National Academy for Civics & Government. She is the author of “Keeping a Republic: An Argument for Sovereignty.” She also serves as a Senior Editor for NewMediaJourna.us and a contributing writer to BigGovernment.com and FamilySecurityMatters.org. http://www.basicsproject.org
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Now Introducing:
The Blame America First Reading of History

Nancy Salvato
July 14, 2014
Most people are familiar with the character Jack Bauer in the series "24". Jack Bauer epitomizes what many would refer to as the ends justify the means. The audience cheers Agent Bauer because he makes the choice to break rules if he knows in the end it will save lives. In the final stage of Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development, "people follow these internalized principles of justice, even if they conflict with laws and rules."

There are many who would like to find fault with our country's Founders and Framers, by pointing out their imperfections and inconsistencies. A common argument is that some owned slaves so they were hypocritical when they talk about the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Some point out that if all men are created equal, that women and blacks should have been given the same consideration. Sadly, those who make these arguments look at the Founders and Framers out of historical context and do not give them proper credit for pointing out that we are born with these rights, and that they are not provided to us by those in positions of leadership. They are unmoved by the words, "in order to form a more perfect union" and do not recognize that our US Constitution was probably the best and least invasive to individual rights that would have made it through the ratification process. Finally, they do not consider that our system of government allowed for our country's large economic growth and the birth of a middle class. They do not credit our political society for the ability to move between classes. This is a sad state of affairs.

Worse still, our nation's schools have been focusing on reading, math, and science, to the detriment of studying history. The Framers understood the importance of education and believed that in order for our republican form of government to survive, we needed to set up checks and balances to prevent a majority from tyrannizing a minority, or visa-versa. If those who are ruled do not understand our system of government or the reasons for how it was set up, they are not in a position to understand when their rights are threatened or being eroded.

In New War Over High School History, Stanley Kurtz warns his readers that if implemented, "the new AP US History Exam is about to entrench a controversial and highly politicized national school curriculum without proper notice or debate. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and a full understanding of our founding principles are on the way out. Race, gender, class, and ethnicity are coming in, all in secrecy and in clear violation of the Constitution's guarantee that education remain in control of the states." Furthermore, "the new AP US History framework effectively forces teachers to train their students in a leftist, blame-America-first reading of history, while omitting traditional treatments of our founding principles."

It would seem to me that any high school that would administer such an exam and any college that would accept the results of this AP exam and provide students college credit based on such a skewed interpretation of history would be violating their Hippocratic Oath...oh, wait a moment, teachers and schools of education do not have Hippocratic Oaths, they promote agendas (though often unwittingly). But that is another conversation. How does one ensure that schools provide an accurate depiction of history, in context? According to Kurtz, the state of Texas has the power to prevent this new test from being adopted. "This is because they represent 10 percent of the College Board's market." I have another idea. Why don't college's, such as Hillsdale, create their own AP exams. Schools would be forced to teach more objectively and provide alternative interpretations so that students understand the ideologies which influence how we see the origins of and current political society.

Learn more about how you can get involved in making sure the US Constitution and civics are included in each student's curriculum by visiting the Center for Civic Education.





Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server