Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Archive Email Author

About Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaughey, PhD, is a constitutional scholar with a PhD from Columbia University, a patient advocate and health policy expert, and a former Lt. Governor of New York state. In 1993 she read the 1,362-page Clinton health bill, warned the nation what it said, and made history. Today she is doing it again. With a PhD in Constitutional History, she can actually tell us what the Obama health law says. In 2009 medical excellence and freedom came under assault again, and McCaughey put her skills to work. She was the first to uncover the health provisions slipped into the February, 2009 stimulus bill. Members of Congress were stunned to learn the stimulus bill could limit care for seniors and dictate your doctor’s decisions. Betsy McCaughey is the author of over three hundred scholarly and popular articles, and three books, including a history of the US Constitution. Betsy McCaughey has taught at Vassar College and Columbia University, and she produced prize-winning studies while at two think tanks, the Manhattan Institute and later the Hudson Institute. http://betsymccaughey.com
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Sanders-McCain VA Reform Bill a Sham
Betsy McCaughey
June 19, 2014
Congress is rushing to pass a compromise drafted by Sens. John McCain (R-AZ.) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) that claims to rescue vets from deadly wait lists. House and Senate leaders are conferring on a final version, congratulating themselves for bipartisanship. But in truth, the bill won't speed up healthcare for vets. The fine print sabotages vets wanting to go outside the VA system.

Last week, the VA's internal investigation revealed that 57,436 newly enrolled veterans are facing wait times of at least 90 days for a first appointment, and 63,869 vets who signed up with the VA in the past decade never got an appointment. At least 23 vets died while waiting. Worse, three-quarters of VA facilities manipulated waiting lists or kept dummy books.

The Sanders-McCain bill will let the waiting and corruption continue. Yes, the bill creates a "Choice Card" permitting veterans to access civilian care if they live 40 miles or more from a VA hospital or can't get an appointment within the VA's definition of an acceptable wait time. But the devil is in the fine print.

Sanders opposed the Choice Card until the final negotiations, and inserted language in the bill making it almost impossible to use the card. That's deliberate. Unions have fought every program to use civilian care. Nine of Sanders' top ten campaign donors are unions.

Even Republican lawmakers are rushing to pass this sham bill. On Thursday, the House Committee on Veterans Affairs held a hearing, but not much hearing occurred. The reception was hostile when I testified how the bill's actual language protects union jobs, not sick vets.

Sec. 301 says vets seeking civilian care have to get a letter from the VA secretary confirming that a VA appointment isn't available. Good luck getting that letter. Some vets have called and e-mailed their local VA for six months or more without getting any response.

Hurdle No. 2 comes at the non-VA doctor's office. The Choice Card tells the doctor: "Please call the Department of Veterans Affairs phone number specified on this card to ensure that treatment has been authorized." Good luck getting that call answered.

To top it off, the bill stipulates that the choice-card program will end in two years -- probably only a few hours after the VA finally gets the hotline set up and issues the cards

In another meaningless gesture, the bill also requires the VA to publish wait times on its Web site. That's a white flag, not a reform. Brits and Canadians are used to seeing hospital wait times in the newspaper. But most Americans don't have to cope with long waits, so why should our vets?

Nothing in the Sanders-McCain bill puts vets in the driver's seat. They still can't escape the VA without active help from the VAs bureaucrats.

Guilty bureaucrats. But the bill is toothless to discipline them: Sec. 408 says that any employee caught falsifying data about wait times or the quality of care vets get will be subject to "a penalty the secretary considers appropriate after notice and opportunity for a hearing." No mandatory minimums.

Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) asked top VA deputy Robert Petzel (now resigned) whether someone caught lying about wait times should be fired. Petzel replied "I don't know whether that's the appropriate level of punishment or not."And what if the secretary does try to fire someone? Current civil-service protections make that nearly impossible. The bill claims to shorten the process, but has a loophole (Sec. 409) that would allow it to drag on indefinitely.

VA managers are circling the wagons. Federal Managers Association President Patricia Niehaus insists that "it is unacceptable for anyone in Congress to call for a streamlining of firing high-level, or any level of federal employee, based simply on appearances or uninvestigated accusations. "Uninvestigated? There have been numerous investigations in the last decade.

Nevertheless, the Sanders-McCain bill calls for not one but two more commissions. More reports that will go unread. At Thursday's hearing, it was obvious Veterans Affairs Committee members had not even read the bill they are hurrying to pass. But that's what Congress does. It holds hearings. It doesn't solve problems.








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server