Front Page
NMJ Search
Editorials
Commentary
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google






Archive Email Author

About Lee Cary
Since 2007, Lee Cary has written hundreds of articles for several conservative websites including the American Thinker, Andrew Breitbart’s Big Journalism and Big Government (as “Archy” Cary in 2010), for TeaParty911.com in 2013, for the Canada Free Press and American Spectator, as well as for New Media Journal. Cary’s work has been quoted on national television (by Sean Hannity) and on nationally syndicated radio (by Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin). His work is cited in Jerome Corsi’s book "The Obama Nation" and in Mark Levin’s "Liberty & Tyranny". Along with Levin, Cary wrote an introduction to Sharron Angle’s book "Right Angle". http://www.TEAParty911.com
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
The Hillary Papers: Why Now?
Lee Cary
February 12, 2014
Why are Diane Blair's private papers archived at the University of Arkansas Special Collections Library just now becoming news?

The Washington Free Beacon article dated February 9, 2014, entitled "The Hillary Papers, Archive of 'closest friend' paints portrait of ruthless First Lady," was featured in the Drudge Report this week.

While the title is sensationalized by attaching the word "ruthless" to Hillary, the timing of the piece is more puzzling than sizzling.

Consider the key paragraph that summarizes the content of papers that have been available to the public since 2010:

"The records paint a complex portrait of Hillary Clinton, revealing her to be a loyal friend, devoted mother, and a cutthroat strategist who relished revenge against her adversaries and complained in private that nobody in the White House was 'tough and mean enough.'"

So she's loyal, devoted, cutthroat, and critical of wimps. Does that sound "ruthless – for a Presidential candidate?"

Then there's her alleged reaction to Bill's philandering. She's portrayed as understanding and realistic by "putting his actions into context." Blair writes, "She thinks she was not smart enough, not sensitive enough, not free enough of her own concerns and struggles to realize the price he was paying."

In short, Hillary was a victim, but was/is willing to claim some degree of culpability.

"'It was a lapse, but she says to his [Bill's] credit he tried to break it off, tried to pull away, tried to manage someone who was clearly a 'narcissistic loony toon'; but it was beyond control,' wrote Blair."

So it was really all Monica Lewinsky's fault. Both Hillary and Bill were victims.

On the other hand, the physical intensity of the episode was/is discounted by Hillary, according to Blair.

"HRC insists, no matter what people say, it was gross inappropriate behavior but it was consensual (was not a power relationship) and was not sex within any real meaning (standup, liedown, oral, etc.) of the term."

Suppose the timing of all this has anything to do with Senator Rand Paul having recently called Bill Clinton a "sexual predator?"

The "Hillary Papers" cited have been available, apparently, since 2010. Why highlight them now?

Well, maybe the Clinton camp knows that, if she runs for the Presidency in 2016, her role in Bill's Tales of Adventures will re-emerge. By framing her explanation early, using the papers of a deceased close friend, Hillary gets ahead of the issue. When it comes up, she can say, "What's it matter now?"

All this is reminiscent of the elusive Rose Law Firm Billing Records that, on January 5, 1996, suddenly appeared before a congressional committee investigating the Whitewater episode.

According to the New York Times,

"The newly discovered documents are copies of billing records from the Rose firm, where Mrs. Clinton helped represent Madison Guaranty, a savings and loan run by James B. McDougal, the Clintons' business partner in the Whitewater land venture. The originals are still missing. Investigators have been seeking the documents to determine the role Mrs. Clinton played in the firm's representation of the savings and loan."

"The Clintons' personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, said tonight that the documents show that the work Mrs. Clinton performed was limited both in time and scope, as she has repeatedly said."

So, in both cases, papers suddenly surface that exonerate Hillary – once in a shady land deal in Arkansas, now in the Tales of Bill's Adventures that led to his impeachment.


Editor's Note: As Hillary Clinton gears up for what will be her final charge at the Oval Office, it is important to remember how she "finances" her political campaigns. Click here to get your copy of The Fraudulent Senator.

This article was originally published at DoctorBlue.Blogspot.com.








The BasicsProject.org informational and educational pamphlet series is now available for Kindle and iPad. Click here to find out more...

The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org are not funded by outside sources. We exist exclusively on tax deductible donations from our readers and contributors.
Please make a sustaining donation today.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of NewMediaJournal.us, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to NewMediaJournal.us.  NewMediaJournal.us is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  NewMediaJournal.us is not supported by any political organization.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by NewMediaJournal.us is copyrighted. NewMediaJournal.us supports BasicsProject.org and its goal: the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2014    Content Copyright © Individual authors
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server